{"id":1918,"date":"2022-01-26T17:22:36","date_gmt":"2022-01-26T15:22:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/?page_id=1918"},"modified":"2022-03-16T23:00:08","modified_gmt":"2022-03-16T21:00:08","slug":"nicolae-bagdasar-o-bibliografie-a-operei","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/volumul-17-2021\/nicolae-bagdasar-o-bibliografie-a-operei\/","title":{"rendered":"Nicolae Bagdasar. O bibliografie a operei | Titus Lates"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Nicolae Bagdasar. O bibliografie a operei<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

TITUS LATES<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
TEZA DE DOCTORAT<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Der Begriff des theoretischen Wertes bei Rickert: Darstellung und Kritik<\/em>, Berlin, Emil Ebering, 1927, 101 p.[1]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
VOLUME<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Filosofia contemporan\u0103 a istoriei<\/em>, [vol. 1][2]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filo\u00adsofie, 1930, XXIX, 285 p.[3]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Din problemele culturii europene<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, 1931, 144 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, 1940, XI, 436 p.[4]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei \u2013 expunere sistematic\u0103 \u015fi critic\u0103<\/em>, vol. I, Bucure\u015fti, Imprimeria Na\u0163ional\u0103 (Academia Rom\u00e2n\u0103. Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri, LIV), 1941, 313 p.[5]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei \u2013 expunere sistematic\u0103 \u015fi critic\u0103<\/em>, vol. II, Bucure\u015fti, Imprimeria Na\u0163ional\u0103 (Academia Rom\u00e2n\u0103. Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri, LVII), 1942, 270 p.[6]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, [ed. a 2-a], Bucure\u015fti, Casa \u015ecoalelor, [1944], 365 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teoreticieni ai civiliza\u0163iei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura \u015etiin\u0163ific\u0103 (Sinteze sociologice), 1969, 184 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrieri<\/em>, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103, introducere \u015fi note de: Gh. Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Eminescu (Biblioteca de filosofie a culturii rom\u00e2ne\u015fti), 1988.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 1995.[7]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Din problemele culturii europene<\/em>, ed. a 2-a, [editor: Victoria Pieptan-Dor], cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de Nicolae Culic, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Funda\u0163iei Intellegentia, 1998.[8]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, [\u00eengrijitor de edi\u0163ie Aurel \u015etefanachi], Ia\u015fi, TipoMoldova, 2001.[9]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, [tehnoredactare: Carmen Golgojan], Bucure\u015fti, Profile Publishing, 2003.[10]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conceptul de valoare teoretic\u0103 la Rickert<\/em>, traducere, note \u015fi comentarii, anexe \u015fi postfa\u0163\u0103 de Alexandru Boboc, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Paideia, 2017.[11]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
CURSURI UNIVERSITARE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Curs de teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, partea a II-a, [stenograf \u015fi editor: Aurel Boia], 1933\u20131934 [curs litografiat].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Curs de teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, partea I, vol. I, [stenograf \u015fi editor: Aurel Boia], 1934\u20131935 [curs litografiat].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Curs de teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, partea I, vol. II, [stenograf \u015fi editor: Aurel Boia], 1935\u20131936 [curs litografiat].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Curs de teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, partea I, vol. III, [stenograf \u015fi editor: Aurel Boia], 1936\u20131937 [curs litografiat].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Curs de logic\u0103<\/em>, editat de \u015et. C\u00e2rstoiu, Facultatea de Filosofie \u015fi Litere din Bucure\u015fti, 1933\u20131934 [curs litografiat].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Curs de logic\u0103<\/em>, Universitatea din Bucure\u015fti, Facultatea de Filosofie \u015fi Litere, 1937\u20131938 [curs litografiat].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
MANUALE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Manual de Psihologie, pentru clasa a VI \u015fi a VII secundar\u0103<\/em>, ed. 1, Bucure\u015fti, Libr. Universal\u0103 Alcalay & Co., 1934.[12]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
ARTICOLE \u00ceN VOLUME<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201eSuccesiunea hegelian\u0103: Dreapta hegelian\u0103\u201d, \u00een Istoria filosofiei moderne<\/em>, vol. II: Dela Kant p\u00e2n\u0103 la evolu\u0163ionismul englez<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie (Omagiu profesorului Ion Petrovici), 1938, pp. 391\u2013396.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eWilhelm Dilthey\u201d, \u00een Istoria filosofiei moderne<\/em>, vol. III: Perioada contemporan\u0103<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie (Omagiu profesorului Ion Petrovici), 1938, pp. 339\u2013346.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTendin\u0163e, teorii, sisteme\u201d, \u201eEstetica\u201d, \u201eFilosofia dreptului\u201d, \u201eFilosofia istoriei\u201d, \u201eFilo\u00adsofia culturii\u201d, \u00een Istoria filosofiei moderne<\/em>, vol. V: Filosofia rom\u00e2neasc\u0103 dela origini p\u00e2n\u0103 ast\u0103zi<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie (Omagiu profesorului Ion Petro\u00advici), 1941, pp. 1\u2013436.[13]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCultura european\u0103\u201d, \u00een: Europa \u00een g\u00e2ndirea rom\u00e2neasc\u0103 interbelic\u0103<\/em>, o antologie de Ovidiu Pecican, Ia\u015fi, Institutul European, 2008, pp. 109\u2013124.[14]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eImperativismul\u201d, \u00een Nicolae Bagdasar, Conceptul de valoare teoretic\u0103 la Rickert<\/em>, traducere, note \u015fi comentarii, anexe \u015fi postfa\u0163\u0103 de Alexandru Boboc, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Paideia, 2017.[15]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
STUDII \u015eI ARTICOLE \u00ceN PERIODICE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201eIdeia de etic\u0103 \u00een doctrina marxist\u0103\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul I, nr. 1, 1924, pp. 7\u20138.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eNo\u0163iunea de revolu\u0163ie la Karl Kautsky\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul I, nr. 14, 1924, pp. 296\u2013298.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eO nou\u0103 concep\u0163ie filosofic\u0103\u201d [Gestalttheorie], \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul II, nr. 48\u201349, 1925, pp. 855\u2013856.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCuno\u015ftin\u0163a istoric\u0103 \u2013 Din punct de vedere logic\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul III, nr 3, 1926, pp. 36\u201338.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eWilhelm Dilthey\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul III, nr. 43, 1926, pp. 667\u2013671.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia filosofiei istoriei la Heinrich Rickert\u201d, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, an VII, nr. 1\u20132, 1927, pp. 254\u2013290.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eHeinrich Maier. Aspecte din filosofia contemporan\u0103 a istoriei\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul III, nr. IV, nr. 29\u201330, 1927, pp. 369\u2013370; nr. 31\u201332, 1927, pp. 384\u2013385.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eEdmund Husserl\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1928, pp. 7\u2013 6.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia filosofiei istoriei la A. D. Xenopol\u201d, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, an VII, nr. 3\u20134, 1928, pp. 558\u2013598.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia filosofiei istoriei dup\u0103 W. Windelband\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1928, pp. 97\u2013118.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePaul Natorp\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1928, pp. 357\u2013378.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia filosofiei istoriei dup\u0103 Wilhelm Dilthey\u201d, \u00een Minerva<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), [anul I], nr. 3, 1928, pp. 40\u201358.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia filosofiei istoriei dup\u0103 Wilhelm Dilthey\u201d (urmare), \u00een Minerva<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul II, nr. 1, 1928, pp. 16\u201326.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePaul Natorp\u201d (urmare \u015fi sf\u00e2r\u015fit), \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1929, pp. 59\u201372.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eFilosofia istoriei lui O. Spengler\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1929, pp. 308\u2013342.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRabindranath Tagore \u015fi civiliza\u0163ia\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1929, pp. 388\u2013405.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eAsupra culturii europene\u201d, \u00een Minerva<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul III, nr. 2\u20133, 1930, pp. 86\u201397.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eSpre o rena\u015ftere a metafizicei\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul VII, nr. 22, 1930, p. 394.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCurente filosofice contimporane \u00een Germania. I. \u015ecoli neokantiene\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul VII, nr. 23\u201324, 1930, pp. 447\u2013448.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eFilosofia istoriei\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVII: Omagiu profesorului C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru<\/em>, 1932, pp. 521\u2013557.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eAsupra no\u0163iunilor individuale\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVIII (Seria Nou\u0103), nr. 3\u20134, 1933, pp. 500\u2013512.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCunoa\u015fterea noologic\u0103 dup\u0103 W. Dilthey\u201d, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul XIV, vol. II: Omagiu profesorului D. Gusti. XXV de ani de \u00eenv\u0103\u0163\u0103m\u00e2nt universitar<\/em>, 1936, pp. 545\u2013564.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eIon Petrovici\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXIII, nr. 1, 1938, pp. 1\u201312.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eI. Petrovici metafizician\u201d, \u00een Preocup\u0103ri literare<\/em>, anul VII, nr. 6\u20137 [La 60 de ani ai profesorului I. Petrovici<\/em>], 1942, pp. 365\u2013383.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eI. Petrovici metafizician\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXVIII, nr. 3\u20134, 1942, pp. 181\u2013204.[16]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eLa philosophie roumaine pendant ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9e\u201d, \u00een Archives pour la science et la r\u00e9forme sociales<\/em>, XVI\u00e9 ann\u00e9e, nr. 1\u20134[17]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>, 1943, pp. 338\u2013348.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDe la lectur\u0103 la filosofare\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul I, no. 1, 1944, pp. 19\u201331.[18]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eLa Filosofia del Derecho en Rumania\u201d, traducci\u00f3n de Francisco Elias de Tejada, Madrid, Instituto Editorial Reus, 1945, 31 p. [publicado en la \u201eRevista general de legislacion y jurisprudencia\u201d, julio\u2013agosto 1945][19]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eJudecata psihologic\u0103 \u015fi judecata logic\u0103\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul III, nr. 1\u20132, 1946, pp. 115\u2013133.[20]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia social-politic\u0103 a lui Simion B\u0103rnu\u0163iu\u201d, \u00een Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri \u015ftiin\u0163ifice. \u015etiin\u0163e sociale<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul VI, nr. 3\u20134, 1955, pp. 241\u2013262.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eProbleme de teoria culturii \u015fi istoriei la A.D. Xenopol (1868\u20131880)\u201d, \u00een Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri \u015ftiin\u0163ifice. Filologie<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul VII, fasc. 1, 1956, pp. 115\u2013147.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePreocup\u0103ri de economie politic\u0103 la \u00abProp\u0103\u015firea\u00bb: contribu\u0163iile lui Ion Ghica, Anton Vincler \u015fi Ion Ionescu de la Brad\u201d, \u00een Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri \u015ftiin\u0163ifice. Filologie<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul VII, fasc. 2, 1956, pp. 65\u2013100.[21]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConcep\u0163ia istoric\u0103 a lui Mihail Kog\u0103lniceanu\u201d, \u00een Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri \u015ftiin\u0163ifice. Filologie<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul VIII, fasc. 2, 1957, pp. 239\u2013264.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDirec\u0163ii \u00een existen\u0163ialism\u201d, \u00een Cronica<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul II, nr. 43(90), 28 octombrie 1967, p. 9; (II), nr. 45(92), 11 noiembrie 1967, p. 9; (III) 47(94), 25 noiembrie 1967, p. 9. [Despre Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Sartre \u015fi Jaspers][22]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eS\u00f6ren Kierkegaard \u2013 omul\u201d, \u00een Ramuri<\/em> (Craiova), anul IV, nr. 11(41), 15 nov. 1967, pp. 16\u201317, 23.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eArnold J. Toynbee, filosof al istoriei\u201d, \u00een Contemporanul<\/em>, nr. 51(1106), 22 decembrie 1967, p. 9.[23]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eN. Berdiaev \u2013 filosof al istoriei\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XV, nr. 3, 1968, pp. 297\u2013306.[24]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eKarl Jaspers (Influen\u0163ele suferite. Raporturile dintre \u015ftiin\u0163e \u015fi filosofie)\u201d, \u00een Ramuri<\/em> (Craiova), anul VI, nr. 6(60), 15 iunie 1969, p. 5.[25]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRealismul naiv\u201d, \u00een Forum<\/em>, anul XXVIII, nr. 5, 1986, pp. 59\u201367.[26]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eJaspers despre libertate\u201d, \u00een Forum<\/em>, anul XXXII, nr. 2, 1990, pp. 33\u201336.[27]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePagini inedite: Existen\u0163ialismul (I): Soren Kierkegaard: Conceptul de angoas\u0103\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul LXI, nr. 1, 2014, pp. 81\u201398.[28]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePagini inedite: Existen\u0163ialismul (II): Karl Jaspers\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul LXI, nr. 2, 2014, pp. 201\u2013212.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePagini inedite: Existen\u0163ialismul (III): Karl Jaspers \u2013 Situa\u0163iile limit\u0103\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul LXI, nr. 3, 2014, pp. 308\u2013320.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePagini inedite: Existen\u0163ialismul (IV): Jean-Paul Sartre\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul LXI, nr. 4, 2014, pp. 421\u2013432.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePagini inedite: Existen\u0163ialismul (V): N. Berdiaeff [1;2]\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul LXI, nr. 5, 2014, pp. 559\u2013574.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePagini inedite: Existen\u0163ialismul (VI): N. Berdiaeff [3;4]\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul LXI, nr. 6, 2014, pp. 697\u2013704.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
RECENZII<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

A. Autori rom\u00e2ni \u015fi traduceri \u00een limba rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eOmul superior, v\u0103zut de doi singuratici: Friedrich Nietzsche \u015fi Thomas Carlyle, dup\u0103 Mihai Negru\u201d, \u00een Neamul Rom\u00e2nesc<\/em>, anul XI, no. 13, p. 5.[29]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eMihail R\u0103dulescu: No\u0163iunea de filosofie. Chi\u015fin\u0103u, 1927, 59 pag.\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1928, pp. 81\u201382.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eC. Narly: Educa\u0163ie \u015fi ideal. Bucure\u015fti, Editura Casei \u015ecoalelor, 1927, 193 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1928, pp. 203\u2013204.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eOctav Botez: Alexandru Xenopol. Teoretician \u015fi filosof al istoriei. Editura Casei \u015ecoalelor, 1928, 222 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1928, p. 305.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTraian Br\u0103ileanu: Politica. Cern\u0103u\u0163i, 1928 (pag. XV+136)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1929, pp. 112\u2013113.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eG. Vladesco-Racoassa: La Sociologie en Roumanie. 1929 (Extrait de la Revue Internationale de Sociologie, Janvier-F\u00e9vrier, 1929)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1929, p. 227.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eF. \u015etef\u0103nescu Goang\u0103, profesor la Universitatea din Cluj: Selec\u0163iunea capacit\u0103\u0163ilor \u015fi orientare profesional\u0103. (Tip. Cartea Rom\u00e2neasc\u0103, Cluj, 1929)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1929, pp. 359\u2013360.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eInginer H. Tillmann: \u00cencerc\u0103ri asupra fenomenelor psihice anormale. Tip. Bucovina, Bucure\u015fti, 1929\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1929, pp. 482\u2013483.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eG. G. Antonescu, profesor la Universitatea din Bucure\u015fti: Educa\u0163ia moral\u0103 \u00een \u015fcoala rom\u00e2neasc\u0103. (Bucure\u015fti, Editura \u201eNa\u0163ional\u0103\u201d S. Ciornei, 1929)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1929, pp. 483\u2013484.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eImmanuel Kant: Intemeierea metafizicei moravurilor. Traducere \u00eenso\u0163it\u0103 de o schi\u0163\u0103 biografic\u0103 \u015fi o introducere \u00een filosofia moral\u0103 de Traian Br\u0103ileanu, profesor la Universitatea din Cern\u0103u\u0163i. (Editura Casei \u015ecoalelor), Bucure\u015fti, 1929)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1929, p. 487.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eP. P. Negulescu: Reforma \u00eenv\u0103\u0163\u0103m\u00e2ntului, ed. a II-a. Editura \u00abCasei \u015ecoalelor\u00bb, 1927\u201d, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul VIII, nr. 1\u20133, 1929, pp. 398\u2013405.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eMihail R\u0103dulescu: Teoria Cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei. Introducere \u00een Filosofie. (Chi\u015fin\u0103u, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1930, pp. 482\u2013483.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201e\u015eerban Ionescu: Considera\u0163iuni critice asupra eticei materialismului economic. Bucure\u015fti, 1930\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1930, pp.203\u2013204.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTudor Vianu: Poezia lui Eminescu. (Colec\u0163ia \u201eG\u00e2ndirea\u201d. Ed. Cartea Rom\u00e2neasc\u0103, Bucure\u015fti, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1930, pp.347\u2013348.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eNicolae M\u0103rgineanu: Psihologia german\u0103 contimporan\u0103. (Studii \u015fi cercet\u0103ri psihologice publicate de Institutul de psihologie experimental\u0103, comparat\u0103 \u015fi aplicat\u0103 al Universit\u0103\u0163ii din Cluj. Tip. \u201eCartea Rom\u00e2neasc\u0103\u201d, Cluj, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1930, pp. 492\u2013493.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGeorge \u015etef\u0103nescu: Charles Renouvier. Teoria categoriilor \u015fi a certitudinei. (Editura Casei \u015ecoalelor, Bucure\u015fti, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1930, pp. 498\u2013499.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eImmanuel Kant: Critica ra\u0163iunii pure. Trad. de Tr. Br\u0103ileanu. (Editura Casei \u015ecoa\u00adle\u00adlor, Bucure\u015fti, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1930, pp. 499\u2013500.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eG. G. Antonescu: Pedagogia general\u0103. (Institutul Pedagogic Rom\u00e2n, Bucure\u015fti, 1930. \u2013 XXXII+595 pag.)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVI (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1931, pp. 89, 90.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDimitrie Cantemir: Metafizica. Trad. de Nicodim Locusteanu, cu o prefa\u0163\u0103 de Em. Grigora\u015f. (Biblioteca Universala, Ed. Ancora, Bucure\u015fti, 347 p.)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVI (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1931, pp. 91\u201392.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eIon Petrovici: Titu Maiorescu. (Editura Casei \u015ecoalelor), 1931, Bucure\u015fti)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVI (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1931, pp. 191\u2013193.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eM. Eminescu: Scrieri politice. Edi\u0163ie comentat\u0103 de D. Mur\u0103ra\u015fu. (Editura \u201eScrisul Rom\u00e2nesc\u201d, Craiova)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVI (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1931, p. 197.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eI. Bruc\u0103r: Probleme noui \u00een filosofie. (Ed. Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, Bucure\u015fti, 1931)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVI (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3\u20134, 1931, pp. 350\u2013352.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePlaton: Ap\u0103rarea lui Socrate, Euthyprhron, Kriton, traducere, precedat\u0103 de o lung\u0103 introducere, de Cezar Papacostea. (Ed. Casa \u015ecoalelor, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVI (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3\u20134, 1931, p. 366.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eI. E. Torou\u0163iu: Studii \u015fi Documente Literare, vol. II. \u201eJunimea\u201d (Bucure\u015fti, 1932)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1933, pp. 97\u201398.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eVictor Papacostea: Teodor Anastasie Cavalioti. (Extras din Revista Istoric\u0103 Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/em>). Cartea Rom\u00e2neasc\u0103, Bucure\u015fti, 1932, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1933, p. 106.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eAl. Busuioceanu: P\u00e2rvan g\u00e2nditorul. Ed. II. (Tip. Ramuri, Craiova, 1934)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIX (Seria Nou\u0103), nr. 1, 1934, pp. 84\u201385.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eI. E. Torou\u0163iu: Studii \u015fi documente literare, vol. IV. (Bucure\u015fti, 1933)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIX (Seria Nou\u0103), nr. 2, 1934, pp. 211\u2013213.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTraian Herseni: Teoria monografiei sociologice. Cu un studiu introductiv: Socio\u00adlogia monografic\u0103, \u015ftiin\u0163\u0103 a realit\u0103\u0163ii sociale de D. Gusti. (Institutul Social Rom\u00e2n, Bucu\u00adre\u015fti, 1934)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIX (Seria Nou\u0103), nr. 3, 1934, pp. 313\u2013315.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eEugeniu Sperantia: \u201ePapillons\u201d de Schumann. Despre principiul unic al vie\u0163ii, dramei \u015fi frumosului. Replic\u0103 la \u201eLaokoon\u201d de Lessing. Ed. \u201eCugetarea\u201d, Bucure\u015fti, 1934\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul XI, nr. 6, 1934, p. 118.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eMarin Stefanesco: Le probl\u00e8me de la M\u00e9thode, (Librairie Alcan, Paris, 1938)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXIII, nr. 2, 1938, pp. 186\u2013191.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTudor Vianu: \u00c4sthetik. (2 B\u00e4nde: Erster Band 1934, 286 Seiten; Zweiter Band 1936, 244 Seiten.) Verlag Funda\u015fia pentru Art\u0103 \u015fi Literatur\u0103, Regele Carol II\u201d, Bukarest\u201d, \u00een Zeitschrift f\u00fcr \u00c4sthetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft<\/em>, Band XXXII, Heft 1, 1938, pp. 172\u2013175.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eImmanuel Kant: Critica puterii de judecare. Traducere \u00eenso\u0163it\u0103 de o introducere de Traian Br\u0103ileanu. (Academia Rom\u00e2n\u0103, 1940)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXV, nr. 2, 1940, pp. 205\u2013206.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eP. P. Negulescu: Conflictul genera\u0163iilor \u015fi factorii progresului. Discurs de recep\u0163ie cu r\u0103spunsul d-lui Dimitrie Gusti\u201d, \u00een Convorbiri literare<\/em>, anul LXXIV, nr. 11\u201312, 1941, pp. 1486\u20131488.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eUn eseu despre existen\u0163ialismul francez\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XVIII, nr. 5, 1971, pp. 643\u2013648. [Despre: Dumitru Ghi\u015fe, Existen\u0163ialismul francez \u015fi problemele eticii<\/em>, ed. a 2-a, Cluj-Napoca, Dacia, 1970].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

B. Autori str\u0103ini<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eMaier H.: Wahrheit und Wirklichkeit. T\u00fcbingen, Mohr, 1926, pp. 590\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XI (seria nou\u0103), fasc. 1\u20134, pp. 102\u2013107.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGerhard von Mutius: Jenseits von Person und Sache. Skizzen und Vortr\u00e4ge zur Philosophie des Pers\u00f6nlichen. F. Bruckmann A.-G., M\u00fcnchen\u201d, 1925<\/em>, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul VII, nr. 1\u20132, 1927, pp. 294\u2013296.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eHans Wenke: Hegels Theorie des objectiven Geistes. 1927, Max Niemeier Verlag Halle Salle\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1928, pp. 89\u201391.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eArthur Stein: Der Begriff des Vestehens bei Dilthey. 1926, Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr, T\u00fcbingen\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1928, pp. 91\u201392.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eN. Lossky: La mati\u00e8re, l\u2019intuition et la vie. Felix Alcan, Paris, 1928\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1928, pp. 308\u2013309.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eReinhard Kynast: Kant. Sein System als Theorie des Kulturbewussteins. Verlag von Ernst Reinhardt, M\u00fcnchen, 1928, 229 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1928, pp. 312\u2013313.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eErich Becher: Grundlagen und Grenzen des Naturerkenners. (M\u00fcnchen und Leipzig, 1928, Verlag von Dunker & Humblot)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 4, 1928, pp. 428\u2013430.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eErich Rothacker: Logik und Systematik der Geisteswissenschaften. M\u00fcnchen und Berlin, 1927, Druck und Verlag von R. Oldenbourg\u201d, <\/em>\u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul VII, nr. 3\u20134, 1928, pp. 621\u2013625.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRichard Kroner: Die Selbstverwirklichung des Geistes. (1928, Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) T\u00fcbingen)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1929, pp. 372\u2013374.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eM. Geiger: Die Wirklicheit der Wissenschaften und die Metaphysik. (Verlag von Friedrich Cohen in Bonn, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 2, 1930, pp. 220\u2013222.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGerhard von Mutius: Wort, Wert, Gemeinschaft. Sprachkritische und soziologische Ueberlegungen. (Verlag von Ernst Reinhardt, M\u00fcnchen, 1929)\u201d, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul IX, nr. 1\u20133, 1930, pp. 334\u2013338.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eMax Adler: Lehrbuch der materialistischen Geschichtsauffasung. (E. Laubsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin, 1930)\u201d, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul IX, nr. 4, 1931, pp. 618\u2013620.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRosset, Clement. Le sentiment de l\u2019absurde dans la philosophie de Schopenhauer (Sentimentul absurdului \u00een filosofia lui Schopenhauer). In: Rev. M\u00e9taphys. Morale, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1964, p. 41\u201378\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, psihologie, logic\u0103<\/em>, vol. II, nr. 6, 1965, pp. 619\u2013623.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eJaspers, Karl. Nicolaus Cusanus, M\u00fcnchen, R. Piper & Co Verlag, 1964, 271 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 1, 1966, pp. 53\u201361.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGuilead, Reuben. \u00catre et libert\u00e9. Une \u00e9tude sur le dernier Heidegger (Existen\u0163\u0103 \u015fi libertate. Studiu aspra ultimei etape a g\u00e2ndirii lui Heidegger). Cu o prefa\u0163\u0103 de Paul Ricoeur. Louvain-Paris, 1965, 184 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, socio\u00adlogie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 2, 1966, pp. 154\u2013164.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDayan, Maurice. L\u2019inconscient selon Bergson (Incon\u015ftientul dup\u0103 Bergson). In: Rev. M\u00e9taphys. Morale, nr. 3, iul.\u2013sept. 1965, p. 287\u2013324, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 3, 1966, pp. 251\u2013256.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eFertig, Hermann. Die Aufl\u00f6sung der klassischen Substanzkonzeption und ein Versuch ihrer Rehabilitierung (Dizolvarea concep\u0163iei clasice despre substan\u0163\u0103 \u015fi \u00eencercarea de a o reabilita). M\u00fcnchen, 1965, 122 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 4, 1966, pp. 341\u2013346.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eBeigbeder, Marc. Dialectiques complexes (Dialectici complexe). In: Rev. M\u00e9taphys. Morale, nr. 4, oct.\u2013dec. 1965, p. 468\u2013476\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 5, 1966, pp. 379\u2013384.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tilliette, X. Schelling contre Hegel (Schelling contra lui Hegel). In: Arch. Phil., ian.\u2013mar. 1966, p. 89\u2013108, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 6, 1966, pp. 523\u2013531.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eWolff, E. Les trois imp\u00e9ratifs cat\u00e9goriques et les trois postulats de la raison pratique chez Kant (Cele trei imperative categorice \u015fi cele trei postulate ale ra\u0163iunii practice la Kant). In: Archs. Phil., 29, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1966, p. 37\u201358, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 7, 1966, pp. 617\u2013624.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRostenne, Paul. L\u2019ontologie entrav\u00e9e de Heidegger (Ontologia blocat\u0103 a lui Heidegger). In: Rev. M\u00e9taphys. Morale, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1966, p. 74\u201399\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. III, nr. 9, 1966, pp. 764\u2013772.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRifka, Fuad. Studien zur \u00c4sthetik Martin Heideggers und Oskar Beckers (Studii asupra esteticii lui Martin Heidegger \u015fi Oskar Becker). T\u00fcbingen, 1965, 158 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 1, 1967, pp. 55\u201364.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eKauppi, Raili. Einige Bemerkungen zum Principium identitatis indiscernibilium bei Leibniz (C\u00e2teva observa\u0163ii referitoare la Principium identitatis indiscernibilium la Leibniz). In: Z. phil. Forsch., 20, nr. 3\u20134, iul.\u2013dec. 1966, p. 497\u2013506\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 2, 1967, pp. 137\u2013141.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDespre no\u0163iunea de lege \u00een \u015ftiin\u0163ele istorice\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 3, 1967, pp. 240\u2013252. [Sunt prezentate ideile principale din articolele care abordeaz\u0103 no\u0163iunea de lege \u00een \u015ftiin\u0163ele istorice, \u00een revista vest-german\u0103 Studium generale<\/em> care consacr\u0103 nr. 11 din 1966 elucid\u0103rii no\u0163iunii de lege \u00een \u015ftiin\u0163\u0103: F.G. Maier, No\u0163iunea de lege \u00een \u015ftiin\u0163ele istorice (pp. 649\u2013667); F. Tomberg, No\u0163iunea de lege \u00een \u015ftiin\u0163ele naturii \u015fi \u015ftiin\u0163ele istorice (pp. 668\u2013669; Philipp Eggers, No\u0163iunea de lege distan\u0163at\u0103 de natur\u0103 (pp. 698\u2013704).]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePiaget, Jean. Sagesse et illusions de la philosophie (\u00cen\u0163elepciunea \u015fi iluziile filosofiei). Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1965, 286 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 4, 1967, pp. 287\u2013297.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGarceau, Beno\u00eet. Heidegger et la concept traditionnel de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 (Heidegger \u015fi conceptul tradi\u0163ional al adev\u0103rului). In: Rev. Univ. Ottawa, 37, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1967, p. 101\u2013114\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 6, 1967, pp. 453\u2013457.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eRintelen, F.-J. von. Le sens dans l\u2019histoire (Sensul \u00een istorie). In: Rev. phil. Fr. Etranger, 91, nr. 4, oct.\u2013dec. 1966, p. 463\u2013475, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 7, 1967, pp. 587\u2013592.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGarulli, Enrico. L\u2019unit\u00e9 id\u00e9ale de la pens\u00e9e heidegg\u00e9rienne d\u2019apr\u00e8s un essai de Gianni Vattimo (Unitatea ideal\u0103 a g\u00eendirii heideggeriene dup\u0103 un eseu al lui Gianni Vattimo). In: Rev. M\u00e9taphys. Morale, 72, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1967, p. 116\u2013125, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 8, 1967, pp. 641\u2013644.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eFilipovi\u010d, V. Die Sendung der Philosophie in unserer Zeit nach Marx und Husserl (Menirea filosofiei \u00een vremea noastr\u0103 dup\u0103 Marx \u015fi Husserl). In: Praxis, 2, nr. 3, 1967, p. 346\u2013352, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. IV, nr. 12, 1967, pp. 1022\u20131026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eFunke, Gerhard. Ph\u00e4nomenologie \u2013 Metaphysik oder Methode? (Este fenomenologia \u2013 metafizic\u0103 sau metod\u0103?). Bonn, H. Bouvier et Co. Verlag, 1966, 272 p., indice de nume; indici de concepte\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 1, 1968, pp. 17\u201330.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. Dem Wendepunkt der Ph\u00e4nomenologie entgegen (\u00cempotriva crizei din fenomenologie). In: Phil. Rdsch., 14, nr. 2\u20133, 1967, p. 182\u2013208, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 1, 1968, pp.36\u201340.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eKamlah, Wilhelm. Aristoteles Wissenschaft vom Seienden als Seienden und die gegenw\u00e4rtige Ontologie (\u015etiin\u0163a aristotelic\u0103 despre existent ca existent \u015fi ontologia actual\u0103). In: Arch. Gesch. Phil., 49, nr. 3, 1967, p. 269\u2013297\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 2, 1968, pp. 226\u2013233.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eZac, Sylvain. Religion naturelle et religions r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9es selon Kant (Religia natural\u0103 \u015fi religiile revelate dup\u0103 Kant). In: Rev. M\u00e9taphys. Morale, 73, ian.\u2013mar. 1968, p. 105\u2013126, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 3, 1968, pp. 403\u2013412.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eTielsch, Elfriede. Die Zukunft der Ethik und die Ethik der Zukunft (Viitorul eticii \u015fi etica viitorului). In: Z. phil. Forsch., 22, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1968, p. 31\u201352\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 4, 1968, pp. 576\u2013584.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eSalamun, Kurt. Der Begriff der Daseinskommunikation bei K. Jaspers (No\u0163iunea de comunicare pe planurile \u00abDasein\u00bb-ului la K. Jaspers). In: Z. phil. Forsch., 22, nr. 2, apr. \u2013 mai 1968, p. 261\u2013285\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 5, 1968, pp. 747\u2013758.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eVan Riet, G. Actualit\u00e9 de Spinoza (Actualitatea lui Spinoza). In: Rev. phil. Louvain, 66, nr. 89, febr. 1968, p. 36\u201384\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 6, 1968, pp. 965\u2013982.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eHeintel, P. Die Dialektik bei Kant (Dialectica la Kant). In: Studium generale, 21, nr. 5, 1968, p. 450\u2013470\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. V, nr. 6, 1968, pp. 982\u2013993.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eNauta, L.W. Dialektik bei Sartre (Dialectica la Sartre). In: Studium generale; 21, nr. 7, 1968, p. 591\u2013608\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VI, nr. 1, 1969, pp. 20\u201330.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eKnauss, G. Die Dialektik des Grundwisses und der Existenzerhellung bei Jaspers (Dialectica cunoa\u015fterii fundamentale \u015fi a explicit\u0103rii existen\u0163ei a Jaspers). In: Studium generale, 21, nr. 7, 1968, p. 571\u2013590, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VI, nr. 1, 1969, pp. 30\u201339.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGrimaldi, N. Le shamanisme socratique. R\u00e9flexion sur le langage dans la philosophie de Platon (\u015eamanismul socratic. Reflexie asupra limbajului \u00een filosofia lui Platon). In: Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 73, nr. 4, oct.\u2013dec. 1968, p. 401\u2013429\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VI, nr. 3, 1969, pp. 385\u2013402.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eP\u00f6ggeler, Otto. La pens\u00e9e de Heidegger. Un cheminement vers l\u2019\u00eatre (G\u00eendirea lui Heidegger . O \u00eenaintare spre existen\u0163\u0103). Traduit de l\u2019allemand par Marianna Simon. Paris, Aubier-Montaigne, 1967, 412 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VI, nr. 4, 1969, pp. 555\u2013575.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eKnecht, Yvonne. Temps et modes chez Spinoza (Timp \u015fi moduri la Spinoza). In: Dialectica, 2, nr. 3\u20134, 1968, p. 214\u2013237\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VI, nr. 5, 1969, pp. 755\u2013760.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eD\u2019Hondt, Jacques. Hegel secret. Recherches sur les sources cach\u00e9es de la pens\u00e9e de Hegel (Hegel secret. Investiga\u0163ii asupra surselor ascunse ale g\u00e2ndirii lui Hegel). Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1968, 344 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VI, nr. 6, 1969, pp. 915\u2013929.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eMarcel, Gabriel. Testament philosophique (Testament filosofic). In: Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, 74, nr. 3, iul.\u2013sept. 1969, p. 253\u2013262\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie, vol. VII, nr. 2, 1970, pp. 176\u2013183.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDubois, Pierre. L\u2019\u00e9volution chez Platon (Evolu\u0163ia la Platon). In: Revue de M\u00e9taphysique et de Morale, nr. 4, oct.\u2013dec. 1969, p. 446\u2013453, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VII, nr. 3, 1970, pp. 396\u2013401.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eP\u00e9trement, S. Sur le livre de Hermann Langerbeck Aufs\u00e4tze zur Gnosis<\/em> (Despre cartea lui Hermann Langerbeck Studii asupra gnosticismului<\/em>. In: Revue de M\u00e9taphysique et de Morale, nr. 4, oct.\u2013dec. 1969, p. 348\u2013445\u201d, <\/em>\u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VII, nr. 3, 1970, pp. 401\u2013405.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eReiter, Josef. Struktur und Geschichte. Der zweideutige Versuch einer Entideologisierung des Geschichtsdenkes durch den Strukturalismus (Structur\u0103 \u015fi istorie. \u00cencercarea echivoc\u0103 a unei dezideologiz\u0103ri a g\u00eendirii istorice de c\u0103tre structuralism). In: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr philosophische Forschung, nr. 2, apr.\u2013iun. 1970, p. 159\u2013182\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VII, nr. 4, 1970, pp. 529\u2013558.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eK\u00fcmmel, Friedrich. \u00dcber den Anspruch des Allgemeinen, wirkliches Allgemeines zu sein (Despre preten\u0163ia universalului de a fi universal real). In: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr philosophische Forschung, 24, nr. 2, apr.\u2013iun. 1970, p. 224\u2013252\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, sociologie, psihologie<\/em>, vol. VII, nr. 5, 1970, pp. 764\u2013775.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eGadamer, Hans Georg. \u00c0 propos de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique (Cu privire la hermeneutic\u0103). In: Archives de Philosophie, nr. 1, ian.\u2013mar. 1970, p. 19\u201327\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103, vol. VIII, nr. 1, 1971, pp. 26\u201330.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePiaget, Jean. Psychologie et epistemologie. Pour une th\u00e9orie de la connaissance (Psihologie \u015fi epistemologie. Pentru o teorie a cunoa\u015fterii). Paris, Editions Gauthier, 1970, 189 p.\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103<\/em>, vol. VIII, nr. 1, 1971, pp. 91\u2013101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eReboul, Olivier. La dignit\u00e9 humaine chez Kant (Demnitatea uman\u0103 la Kant). In: Revue de M\u00e9taphysique et de Morale,apr.\u2013iun. 1970, p. 189\u2013217\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103<\/em>, vol. VIII, nr. 2, 1971, pp. 173\u2013188.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eVanbergen, P. Des doctrines morales \u00e0 la science morale (De la doctrinele morale la \u015ftiin\u0163a moral\u0103). In: Revue internationale de philosophie, fasc. 3\u20134, 1970, p. 508\u2013538\u201d, \u00een Revista de referate \u015fi recenzii. Filosofie, logic\u0103<\/em>, vol. VIII, nr. 3, 1971, pp. 253\u2013263.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Orient\u0103ri filosofice contemporane<\/em>, [cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de Mircea Ioanid], Bucure\u015fti, 1971. [Volum multigrafiat].[30]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
CONFERIN\u0162E<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201eImmanuel Kant despre o pace etern\u0103 \u00eentre popoare\u201d, \u00een Forum<\/em>, anul XXVIII, nr. 3, 1986, pp. 34\u201338.[31]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eIm. Kant \u015fi proiectul s\u0103u de pace etern\u0103 \u00eentre popoare\u201d, \u00een Manuscriptum<\/em>, anul XVII, nr. 3(64), 1986, pp. 20\u201323. [Conferin\u0163\u0103 radiofonic\u0103 rostit\u0103 \u00een 28 ianuarie 1944].[32]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
NECROLOGURI<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201e\u2020 Karl Vorl\u00e4nder\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIV (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 3, 1929, p. 376.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201e\u2020 Vasile Gherasim\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XVIII (Seria Nou\u0103), no. 1, 1933, p. 127.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201e\u2020 Hans Vaihinger\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIX (Seria Nou\u0103), nr. 1, 1934, pp. 110\u2013111.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201e\u2020 Heinrich Maier\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XIX (Seria Nou\u0103), nr. 1, 1934, pp. 111\u2013112.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
EDIT\u0102RI, PREFE\u0162E \u015eI INTRODUCERI<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

George Berkeley, Principiile cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei omene\u015fti<\/em>, trad. din englez\u0103 de S. C\u0103teanu, cu o introducere de N. Bagdasar, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, 1932.[33]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

David Hume, Cercetare asupra intelectului omenesc<\/em>, trad. din englez\u0103 de S. C\u0103teanu, cu o introducere de N. Bagdasar, Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, [1936].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vasile Conta, Teoria fatalismului. Teoria ondula\u0163iei universale<\/em>, comentate de N. Bagdasar, Craiova, Editura Scrisul Rom\u00e2nesc, [1943].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antologie filosofic\u0103: filosofi str\u0103ini<\/em>, [cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de I. Petrovici], Bucure\u015fti, Casa \u015ecoalelor, 1943, IX, 574 p.[34]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antologie filosofic\u0103: filosofi str\u0103ini<\/em>, [cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de I. Petrovici], ed. a doua rev\u0103zut\u0103 \u015fi ad\u0103ugit\u0103, Bucure\u015fti, Casa \u015ecoalelor, 1943, XIV, 732 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antologie filosofic\u0103: filosofia antic\u0103<\/em>, ed. rev\u0103zut\u0103 \u015fi ad\u0103ugit\u0103 de Octavian Nistor, selec\u0163ia textelor \u015fi prezent\u0103ri de Nicolae Bagdasar, Virgil Bogdan \u015fi Octavian Nistor, bibliografia selectiv\u0103, indice de nume \u015fi note de Octavian Nistor, pref. de G. Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Minerva (Biblioteca pentru to\u0163i), 1975 [2 vol.][35]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antologie filosofic\u0103: filosofi str\u0103ini<\/em>, postf. de prof. univ. dr. Gheorghe Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Universal Dalsi, 1995.[36]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antologie filosofic\u0103: filosofi str\u0103ini<\/em>, postf. de Gheorghe Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Chi\u015fin\u0103u, Editura Uniunii Scriitorilor, 1996.[37]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru, Timp \u015fi destin<\/em>, cu un cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de N. Bagdasar [\u201e\u00abTimpul \u015fi Destinul\u00bb \u00een viziunea lui C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d[38]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>] \u015fi o postf. de I. Frunzetti, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Saeculum I. O.\/ Vestala, 1996.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
TRADUCERI<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Sociologia ca domeniu de cercetare \u015fi obiect de \u00eenv\u0103\u0163\u0103m\u00e2nt<\/em> de Dr. L. von Wiese, profesor la universitatea din Colonia, secretar general al Institutului de cercet\u0103ri pentru \u015ftiin\u0163ele sociale, trad. de N. Bagdasar, \u00een Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, anul VIII, nr. 1\u20133, 1929, pp. 482\u2013487.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, [traduc\u0103tori: Nicolae Bagdasar, Elena Moisuc, studiu introductiv, glosar kantian \u015fi indice de nume proprii: Nicolae Bagdasar], Bucure\u015fti, Editura \u015etiin\u0163ific\u0103, 1969.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, trad. de Nicolae Bagdasar \u015fi Elena Moisuc, Bucure\u015fti, Editura IRI (Cogito), 1994.[39]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, trad. de Nicolae Bagdasar \u015fi Elena Moisuc, ed. a 3-a, \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Ilie P\u00e2rvu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura IRI (Cogito), 1998.[40]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, trad. de Nicolae Bagdasar \u015fi Elena Moisuc, ed. a 3-a, \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Ilie P\u00e2rvu, Bucure\u015fti, Univers Enciclopedic Gold (Cogito), 2009.[41]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, \u00centemeierea metafizicii moravurilor. Critica ra\u0163iunii practice<\/em>, [traducere, studiu introductiv, note \u015fi indici: Nicolae Bagdasar, postf.: Niculae Bellu], Bucure\u015fti, Editura \u015etiin\u0163ific\u0103, 1972.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii practice. \u00centemeierea metafizicii moravurilor<\/em>, trad., studiu introductiv, note \u015fi indice de nume proprii de Nicolae Bagdasar, Bucure\u015fti, Editura IRI (Cogito), 1995.[42]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii practice. \u00centemeierea metafizicii moravurilor<\/em>, trad., studiu introductiv, note \u015fi indice de nume proprii de Nicolae Bagdasar, Bucure\u015fti, Editura IRI (Cogito), 1999<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Critica ra\u0163iunii practice. \u00centemeierea metafizicii moravurilor<\/em>, trad., studiu introductiv, note \u015fi indice de nume proprii de Nicolae Bagdasar, Bucure\u015fti, Univers Enciclopedic Gold (Cogito), 2010.[43]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immanuel Kant, Opere<\/em>: Critica ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, traducere de Nicolae Bagdasar \u015fi Elena Moisuc; Critica ra\u0163iunii practice<\/em>, traducere de Nicolae Bagdasar, Critica facult\u0103\u0163ii de judecare<\/em>, traducere de Vasile Dem. Zamfirescu \u015fi Alexandru Surdu, edi\u0163ie \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Ilie P\u00e2rvu, Bucure\u015fti, Academia Rom\u00e2n\u0103\/Funda\u0163ia Na\u0163ional\u0103 pentru \u015etiin\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Art\u0103\/Muzeul Na\u0163ional al Literaturii Rom\u00e2ne, 2017.[44]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
NOTE \u015eI \u00ceNSEMN\u0102RI<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201e\u00cen jurul tratatului de la Locarno\u201d, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul II, nr. 46\u201347, 1925, pp. 823\u2013824.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eVoin\u0163a de cultur\u0103\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul I, no. 1, 1944, pp. 127\u2013128.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eDiscu\u0163iile \u015fi polemicile \u00eentre filosofi\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul I, no. 1, 1944, pp. 147\u2013148.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eSemne bune…\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi\/ Alba-Iulia[45]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>), anul I, no. 2\u20133, 1944, pp. 281\u2013283.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCeva despre mit\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi\/ Alba-Iulia), anul I, no. 2\u20133, 1944, pp. 283\u2013284.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eFilosofie \u015fi… cenzori filosofici\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi\/ Alba-Iulia), anul I, nr. 4, 1944, pp. 412\u2013413.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCursuri la mod\u0103\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi\/ Alba-Iulia), anul I, nr. 4, 1944, pp. 415\u2013417.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eEnigme\u201d, \u00een Ethos<\/em> (Ia\u015fi\/ Alba-Iulia), anul I, nr. 4, 1944, p. 418.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201ePe marginea proiectului de periodizare a istoriei filosofiei din Rom\u00e2nia\u201d, \u00een Cercet\u0103ri filosofice<\/em>, anul V, nr. 2, 1958, pp. 143\u2013144.[46]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConservarea inteligen\u0163ei\u201d, \u00een Sc\u00e2nteia tineretului<\/em>, anul XXIV, seria II, nr. 5818, 4 februarie 1968, pp. 1, 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
INTERVIURI<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201eA cunoa\u015fte nu \u00eenseamn\u0103 a \u00eemp\u0103rt\u0103\u015fi\u201d, \u00een Tribuna<\/em> (Cluj), anul XI, nr. 3 (520), 19 ianuarie 1967. [\u00cen cadrul anchetei \u201e\u00cen aten\u0163ie \u2013 filosofia\u201d realizat\u0103 de Romulus Zaharia].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eA cunoa\u015fte totul, nu \u00eenseamn\u0103 a \u00eembr\u0103\u0163i\u015fa totul\u201d, \u00een Munca<\/em>, anul XXIII, nr. 6232, 25 XI 1967, pp. 1, 3. [Interviu luat de Victor Bibicioiu].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
AMINTIRI \u015eI PORTRETE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

\u201eC\u00e2teva amintiri despre Camil Petrescu\u201d, \u00een Cronica<\/em> (Ia\u015fi), anul II, nr. 24, 17 iunie 1967.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d, \u00een Forum<\/em>, anul XXVIII, nr. 4, 1986, pp. 65\u201368.[47]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCum am devenit traduc\u0103tor?\u201d, \u00een Forum<\/em>, anul XXVIII, nr. 6, 1986, pp. 63\u201365.[48]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eAmintiri\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XL, nr. 3, 1993, pp. 287\u2013294.[49]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d[50]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XLI, nr. 2, 1994, pp. 183\u2013205.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Din problemele culturii europene<\/em>, ed. a 2-a, [editor: Victoria Pieptan-Dor], cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de Nicolae Culic, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Funda\u0163iei Intellegentia, 1998, pp. 151\u2013184 [\u201eLa studii \u00een Germania 1922\u20131927\u201d (fragmente din jurnalul inedit)].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amintiri. Nota\u0163ii autobiografice<\/em>, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103 \u015fi studiu introductiv de Constantin Aslam, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Tritonic, 2004.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Opere<\/em>, vol. I: Amintiri<\/em>, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Rodica Pandele \u015fi Gh. Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, postf. \u015fi note de Gh. Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2006, 297 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Opere<\/em>, vol. II: Portrete<\/em>, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Rodica Pandele \u015fi Gh. Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, pref. de Nicolae Bagdasar, postf. \u015fi note de Gh. Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2006, 237 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conceptul de valoare teoretic\u0103 la Rickert<\/em>, traducere, note \u015fi comentarii, anexe \u015fi postfa\u0163\u0103 de Alexandru Boboc, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Paideia, 2017, pp. 215\u2013225 (\u201eSecretar de redac\u0163ie al \u00abRevistei de Filosofie\u00bb, secretar al Societ\u0103\u0163ii Rom\u00e2ne de Filosofie\u201d din Amintiri<\/em>) \u015fi 253\u2013291 (\u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d din Portrete<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
CORESPONDEN\u0162\u0102<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n

Scrisori c\u0103tre Camil Petrescu<\/em>, vol. I, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103, prefa\u0163\u0103, note \u015fi indici de Florica Ichim, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Minerva, 1981, p. 19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrisori c\u0103tre Tudor Vianu<\/em>, vol. I: (1916 \u2013 1935)<\/em>, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Maria Alexandrescu Vianu \u015fi Vlad Alexandrescu, note de Vlad Alexandrescu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Minerva, 1992, pp. 86, 153, 154.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scrisori c\u0103tre Tudor Vianu<\/em>, vol. II: (1936 \u2013 1949)<\/em>, ed. \u00eengrijit\u0103 de Maria Alexandrescu Vianu \u015fi Vlad Alexandrescu, note de Vlad Alexandrescu, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Minerva, 1994, pp. 20, 184, 185.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201eCoresponden\u0163\u0103\u201d, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XL, nr. 6, 1993, pp. 589\u2013606.[51]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Scrisoare c\u0103tre Vasile B\u0103ncil\u0103], \u00een Manuscriptum<\/em>, anul XXIX, nr. 3\u20134 (112\u2013113), 1998, p. 257.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Din problemele culturii europene<\/em>, ed. a 2-a, [editor: Victoria Pieptan-Dor], cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de Nicolae Culic, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Funda\u0163iei Intellegentia, 1998, pp. 191\u2013219 (\u201eDin scrisorile primite de N. Bagdasar 1924\u20131935\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conceptul de valoare teoretic\u0103 la Rickert<\/em>, traducere, note \u015fi comentarii, anexe \u015fi postfa\u0163\u0103 de Alexandru Boboc, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Paideia, 2017, pp. 228\u2013252[52]<\/a><\/sup><\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Note<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
  1. \n

    A fost tradus\u0103 \u00een limba rom\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een volumul: Nicolae Bagdasar, Conceptul de valoare teoretic\u0103 la Rickert<\/em>, traducere, note \u015fi comentarii, anexe \u015fi postfa\u0163\u0103 de Alexandru Boboc, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Paideia, 2017, pp. 11\u2013113. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  2. \n

    Singurul volum ap\u0103rut dintr-o lucrare pl\u0103nuit\u0103 \u00een trei volume. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  3. \n

    Recenzie: Nic. M\u0103rgineanu, \u00een Societatea de m\u00e2ine<\/em> (Cluj), anul VII, nr. 23\u201324, 1 \u015fi 15 decembrie 1930, pp. 426, 451. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  4. \n

    \u00cen prefa\u0163\u0103, autorul spune c\u0103 \u201elucrarea de fa\u0163\u0103 este un extras din Istoria filosofiei moderne<\/em>, vol. V\u201d. Lucrarea amintit\u0103 va fi \u00eens\u0103 tip\u0103rit\u0103 abia \u00een anul urm\u0103tor, timp \u00een care Bagdasar va avea timp s\u0103 completeze \u015fi s\u0103 revizuiasc\u0103 unele capitole. Volumul are la sf\u00e2r\u015fit o Corrigenda<\/em> introdus\u0103 \u00een urma unei scrisori primite de autor de la P.P. Negulescu. Recenzie: \u015et. Zissulescu, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXV, nr. 2, 1940, pp. 200\u2013202. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  5. \n

    Recenzie: \u015et. Zissulescu, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXVI, nr. 3\u20134, 1941, pp. 384\u2013393. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  6. \n

    Recenzie: \u015et. Zissulescu, \u00een Revista de filosofie<\/em>, vol. XXVII, nr. 3\u20134, 1942, pp. 344\u2013346; despre ambele volume: Dumitru Isac, \u00een Symposion<\/em>, seria II, anul III, nr. 1, iunie 1943, pp. 103\u2013107. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  7. \n

    \u00cen Not\u0103 asupra edi\u0163iei<\/em> se precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103 textul de fa\u0163\u0103 reproduce ed. a 2-a a lucr\u0103rii cu acela\u015fi titlu, ap\u0103rut\u0103 \u00een anul 1944; a fost adus\u0103 la zi ortografia, au fost \u00eendrepta\u0163i termeni care, \u00een epoc\u0103, aveau un \u00een\u0163eles diferit ori un alt accent semantic, au fost \u00eenlocui\u0163i unii termeni impropriu folosi\u0163i, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 fie afectat \u00eens\u0103 sensul ideii cu care se lucra, au fost corectate tacit gre\u015felile de tipografie. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  8. \n

    Edi\u0163ia o reia pe cea dint\u00e2i, ap\u0103rut\u0103 \u00een 1931. \u00cen anex\u0103 se public\u0103 un fragment din jurnalul inedit al lui N. Bagdasar, iar \u00een final sunt reproduse c\u00e2teva scrisori adresate profesorului \u015fi documente iconografice. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  9. \n

    Reproduce textul din volumul cu acela\u015fi titlu editat de Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, \u00een 1940. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  10. \n

    Edi\u0163ia reproduce textul din volumul cu acela\u015fi titlu, editat de Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie, \u00een 1940. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  11. \n

    Cuprinde traducerea tezei de doctorat, capitolul \u201eImperativismul\u201d, din Teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em> (1944), fragmente din Amintiri<\/em>, Portrete<\/em> \u015fi Coresponden\u0163\u0103<\/em>. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  12. \n

    N. Bagdasar a contribuit la aceast\u0103 lucrare \u00eenlocuind \u015fi redact\u00e2nd texte ale cursului de psihologie propus de I. Petrovici la \u015ecoala de \u015etiin\u0163e Administrative din Bucure\u015fti. Textul redactat de N. Bagdasar a fost revizuit de I. Petrovici \u201epentru a se p\u0103stra unitatea stilului \u015fi a concep\u0163iunii\u201d. Manualul a fost reeditat, ajung\u00e2nd p\u00e2n\u0103 la a 11-a edi\u0163ie, \u00een 1945, la Editura Libr\u0103riei Socec & Co. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  13. \n

    Volum elaborat \u00een colaborare cu Traian Herseni \u015fi S. S. B\u00e2rs\u0103nescu, care au scris sec\u0163iunile \u201eSociologia\u201d, respectiv \u201ePedagogia\u201d. \u00cen acest volum, Bagdasar a reluat cuprinsul din volumul Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, tip\u0103rit cu un an \u00eenainte (1940), \u015fi a completat capitolul dedicat lui C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru cu referin\u0163e la Timp \u015fi destin<\/em>, carte ap\u0103rut\u0103 \u00een 1940 (pp. 106\u2013113). De asemene a revizuit capitolul dedicat lui P. P. Negulescu (pp. 114\u2013122), dup\u0103 observa\u0163iile semnalate de acesta (vezi supra<\/em>). Potrivind lucrurile, Bagdasar a reu\u015fit s\u0103 p\u0103streze, dincolo de aceste dou\u0103 interven\u0163ii, aceea\u015fi pagina\u0163ie a lucr\u0103rii, p\u00e2n\u0103 la capitolul final intitulat \u201eAl\u0163i autori\u201d. Aici, a \u00eenlocuit prezentarea (evreu)lui I. Bruc\u0103r cu cea a lui Grigore T\u0103u\u015fan. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  14. \n

    Articol ap\u0103rut \u00een vol. Din problemele culturii europene<\/em> (1931); reprodus dup\u0103: Scrieri<\/em> (1988), pp. 375\u2013383. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  15. \n

    Capitol preluat din Teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em> (1944), pp. 470\u2013548. Ortografia \u015fi unele expresii au fost adaptate spiritului actual al limbii rom\u00e2ne. Au fost traduse (de Al. Boboc) citatele date de autor \u00een limba german\u0103. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  16. \n

    Reluare a articolului publicat ini\u0163ial \u00een Preocup\u0103ri literare<\/em>, corectat \u015fi completat. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  17. \n

    Num\u0103r din Arhiva pentru \u015ftiin\u0163a \u015fi reforma social\u0103<\/em>, conceput \u00een 1939 \u00een vederea Congresului Interna\u0163ional de Sociologie care urma s\u0103 aib\u0103 loc la Bucure\u015fti, dar care, din cauza circumstan\u0163elor, nu a mai avut loc. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  18. \n

    Reprezint\u0103 partea introductiv\u0103 din Curs de logic\u0103 1933\u20131934<\/em>: \u201ePreliminarii pentru \u00eencep\u0103tori\u201d, pp. 3\u201334. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  19. \n

    Reprezint\u0103 traducerea unui capitol din Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em> (1941). \u00cen nota introductiv\u0103, traduc\u0103torul \u00eei mul\u0163ume\u015fte profesorului A. Busuioceanu, care i-a propus materialul, l-a ini\u0163iat \u00een cunoa\u015fterea culturii rom\u00e2ne \u015fi l-a ajutat \u00een deslu\u015firea unor neclarit\u0103\u0163i din text. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  20. \n

    Fragment din Curs de logic\u0103 1937\u20131938<\/em>, pp. 137\u2013187. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  21. \n

    Studiu scris \u00een colaborare cu I. L\u0103z\u0103rescu. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  22. \n

    Bagdasar r\u0103spunde prin aceste articole invita\u0163iei revistei de a oferi posibilitatea cercet\u0103torilor din domeniul filosofiei de a-\u015fi spune \u201epunctul de vedere asupra unor teme \u015fi rezolv\u0103ri existen\u0163ialiste\u201d. \u015eirul opiniilor e deschis de un articol semnat de Grigore Popa, intitulat \u201eO defini\u0163ie a existen\u0163ialismului\u201d. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  23. \n

    Con\u0163inutul articolului va fi inclus \u00een capitolul dedicat lui Arnold J. Toynbee din volumul Teoreticieni ai civiliza\u0163iei<\/em> (1969). \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  24. \n

    Con\u0163inutul articolului va fi inclus \u00een capitolul dedicat lui N. Berdiaev din volumul Teoreticieni ai civiliza\u0163iei<\/em> (1969). \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  25. \n

    Fragment din lucrarea, \u00een manuscris, intitulat\u0103: Existen\u0163ialismul<\/em>. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  26. \n

    Capitol din Curs de teoria cuno\u015ftin\u0163ei<\/em>, partea I, vol. 1, necuprins \u00een volumul tip\u0103rit. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  27. \n

    \u00centr-o not\u0103 de subsol se precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103 fragmentul face parte din lucrarea: Autori \u015fi opere existen\u0163ialiste<\/em>, cap. II, paragr. 10. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  28. \n

    Textul este precedat de o Not\u0103 introductiv\u0103<\/em> de Alexandru Boboc \u015fi Nota editorului<\/em> de Alexandru Surdu. Reprezint\u0103, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu textele publicate \u00een numerele urm\u0103toare ale revistei, o selec\u0163ie din opera lui Nicolae Bagdasar, Autori \u015fi opere existen\u0163ialiste<\/em>, care face parte dintr-un proiect al s\u0103u intitulat \u201eExisten\u0163ialismul\u201d. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  29. \n

    Sub pseudonimul: N. B\u0103rdescu. N. Bagdasar a semnat multe articole \u00een aceast\u0103 publica\u0163ie, \u00een anii 1915\u20131916. Am re\u0163inut doar acest articol care anun\u0163\u0103 pe asiduul recenzent de mai t\u00e2rziu. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  30. \n

    Volumul reune\u015fte toate referatele \u015fi recenziile publicate de N. Bagdasar \u00een \u201eRevista de referate \u015fi recenzii\u201d, \u00eentre anii 1965\u20131971. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  31. \n

    Se men\u0163ioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 textul este inedit \u015fi a fost pus la dispozi\u0163ia redac\u0163iei de Ecaterina Bagdasar. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  32. \n

    Text identic cu cel anterior. Din \u201eC\u00e2teva date biografice\u201d care \u00eenso\u0163esc necrologul din Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XVIII, nr. 5, 1971, pp. 681\u2013688, putem afla c\u0103 a fost suportul pentru o conferin\u0163\u0103 la Radio din 28 ianuarie 1944. \u00cen aceea\u015fi bibliografie sunt men\u0163ionate \u015fi alte conferin\u0163e sus\u0163inute de N. Bagdasar la radio \u2013 \u201ePsihologia ascult\u0103torului la radio\u201d (14 septembrie 1934), \u201eSchopenhauer artist\u201d (27 septembrie 1941), \u201eTeoria fatalismului\u201d (7 septembrie 1943), \u201ePsihologia ascult\u0103torului la radio\u201d (14 septembrie 1934); la Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie \u2013 \u201eRabindranath Tagore \u015fi civiliza\u0163ia\u201d (7 noiembrie 1929), \u201eA. D. Xenopol\u201d (1 noiembrie 1930), \u201eRabindranath Tagore \u015fi civiliza\u0163ia\u201d (7 noiembrie 1929), \u201eKarl Marx\u201d (1935); \u015fi \u00een cadrul Academiei de \u015etiin\u0163e Morale \u015fi Politice \u2013 \u201eSemnificarea istoric\u0103 a filosofiei lui Bergson\u201d (1941). \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  33. \n

    A ap\u0103rut o nou\u0103 edi\u0163ie \u00een 1938, cu o prefa\u0163\u0103 semnat\u0103 de Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filosofie care a constatat c\u0103 exemplarele din prima edi\u0163ie s-au epuizat \u015fi o nou\u0103 edi\u0163ie s-a sim\u0163it necesar\u0103. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  34. \n

    \u00centocmit\u0103 \u00eempreun\u0103 cu Virgil Bogdan \u015fi C. Narly, la \u00eens\u0103rcinarea lui I. Petrovici. Au ap\u0103rut dou\u0103 edi\u0163ii \u00een acela\u015fi an; ed. a 2-a, rev\u0103zut\u0103 \u015fi ad\u0103ugit\u0103: XVI, 734 p. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  35. \n

    Despre proiectul apari\u0163iei acestei edi\u0163ii, Bagdasar relateaz\u0103 \u00een interviul luat de V. Bibicioiu, \u00een ziarul Munca<\/em> din 25.11.1967. Vezi infra<\/em>. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  36. \n

    Reeditare a edi\u0163iei a 2-a din 1943. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  37. \n

    Reluare a reedit\u0103rii din 1995. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  38. \n

    Extras din: Istoria filosofiei moderne<\/em>, vol. V (1941), pp. 106\u2013113. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  39. \n

    Reproduce traducerea ap\u0103rut\u0103 \u00een 1969. Cuprinde, la sf\u00e2r\u015fit, textul lui N. Bagdasar \u201eCum am devenit traduc\u0103tor?\u201d, din revista Forum<\/em>, nr. 6, 1986. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  40. \n

    Cu prilejul reedit\u0103rii acestei lucr\u0103ri, redac\u0163ia ne informeaz\u0103 c\u0103 a corectat unele erori de tipar \u015fi unele inconsecven\u0163e terminologice. Totodat\u0103 au fost indicate diferen\u0163ele dintre ed. 1 \u015fi ed. a 2-a a Criticii ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, acolo unde lipseau \u00een varianta ini\u0163ial\u0103 din 1969. Textul traducerii a fost revizuit de Ilie P\u00e2rvu. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  41. \n

    Reluare a edi\u0163iei din 1998. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  42. \n

    Reproduce traducerea ap\u0103rut\u0103 \u00een 1972. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  43. \n

    Reluare a edi\u0163iei ap\u0103rute \u00een 1995 \u015fi reeditate \u00een 1999. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  44. \n

    \u00cen aceast\u0103 edi\u0163ie Ilie P\u00e2rvu a continuat munca de revizuire a textului Criticii ra\u0163iunii pure<\/em>, tradus de N. Bagdasar, \u015fi a indicat coresponden\u0163a paginilor din traducere cu paginile edi\u0163iei standard a lucr\u0103rilor lui Kant, realizat\u0103 de Academia Prusac\u0103 de \u015etiin\u0163e. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  45. \n

    Num\u0103r ap\u0103rut \u00een perioada \u00een care Universitatea din Ia\u015fi a fost evacuat\u0103 la Alba-Iulia. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  46. \n

    \u00cen urma particip\u0103rii la consf\u0103tuirea din 10 iulie 1957, consacrat\u0103 periodiz\u0103rii filosofiei \u00een Rom\u00e2nia, la care Mircea Ioanid a prezentat un \u201eProiect de periodizare a istoriei filosofiei din Rom\u00e2nia\u201d, publicat \u00een Cercet\u0103ri filosofice<\/em>, anul IV, nr. 5, 1957, pp. 175\u2013189. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  47. \n

    Fragment din Portrete<\/em>. Vezi infra<\/em>. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  48. \n

    Fragment autobiografic (datat: 1 mai 1970), \u00een care relateaz\u0103 mai pe larg o secven\u0163\u0103 pe care o reg\u0103sim men\u0163ionat\u0103 \u00een ultima parte din Amintiri<\/em>. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  49. \n

    Este redat un fragment din capitolul \u201eSecretar de redac\u0163ie al \u00abRevistei de Filosofie\u00bb, secretar al Societ\u0103\u0163ii Rom\u00e2ne de Filosofie\u201d, din Amintiri<\/em>. Textul e precedat de o not\u0103 introductiv\u0103 semnat\u0103 de Alexandru Boboc. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  50. \n

    Cuprinde \u00eentreaga sec\u0163iune dedicat\u0103 lui C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru din Portrete<\/em>. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  51. \n

    \u00centr-o not\u0103, Alexandru Boboc precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103 paginile fac parte din volumul: Coresponden\u0163\u0103. Nicolae Bagdasar printre Prieteni \u015fi Colaboratori<\/em> (Edi\u0163ie \u00eengrijit\u0103, cuv\u00e2nt introductiv, note, tablou cronologic de Ecaterina Bagdasar, c\u0103reia \u00eei apar\u0163in \u015fi traducerile respectivelor scrisori). Volumul nu a mai ap\u0103rut. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>

  52. \n

    E reluat\u0103 \u201ecoresponden\u0163a\u201d din Revista de filosofie<\/em>, tomul XL, nr. 6, 1993, pp. 589\u2013606. \u2191<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    \n\n\n\n

    [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XVII: Teorii ale adev\u0103rului<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2021, pp. 156\u2013170]<\/p>\n\n\n

    \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Nicolae Bagdasar. O bibliografie a operei TITUS LATES Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne TEZA DE DOCTORAT Der Begriff des theoretischen Wertes bei Rickert: Darstellung und Kritik, Berlin, Emil Ebering, 1927, 101 p.[1] VOLUME Filosofia contemporan\u0103 a istoriei, [vol. 1][2], Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filo\u00adsofie, 1930, XXIX, 285 p.[3] Din problemele […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":1785,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[201,195,203,63,262],"tags":[40],"class_list":["post-1918","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","category-bibliografii","category-articole","category-bibliografii-tematice","category-sifr17","category-titus-lates","tag-nicolae-bagdasar"],"featured_image_src":null,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/mm\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Nicolae Bagdasar. O bibliografie a operei TITUS LATES Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne TEZA DE DOCTORAT Der Begriff des theoretischen Wertes bei Rickert: Darstellung und Kritik, Berlin, Emil Ebering, 1927, 101 p.[1] VOLUME Filosofia contemporan\u0103 a istoriei, [vol. 1][2], Bucure\u015fti, Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Filo\u00adsofie, 1930, XXIX, 285 p.[3] Din problemele…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1918","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1918"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1918\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5843,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1918\/revisions\/5843"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1785"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}