{"id":5117,"date":"2022-03-11T20:19:34","date_gmt":"2022-03-11T18:19:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/?page_id=5117"},"modified":"2022-03-18T22:44:56","modified_gmt":"2022-03-18T20:44:56","slug":"volumul-15-2019","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/volumul-15-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumul 15 (2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
1. PROBLEMA CON\u0218TIIN\u021aEI<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Logica genetic\u0103 a lui C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 11\u201315]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Extras<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Influen\u0163at de a\u015fa-numita \u201epsihologie a popoarelor\u201d (V\u00f6lkerpsychologie<\/em>), profesat\u0103 \u015fi de Wundt, ca \u015fi de cercet\u0103rile lui L\u00e9vy-Bruhl, R\u0103dulescu-Motru pune \u00een discu\u0163ie mentalitatea omului primitiv<\/em>, considerat\u0103 pre-logic\u0103. Specificul acesteia l-ar constitui dominan\u0163a treptei senzoriale a cunoa\u015fterii, al c\u0103rei produs principal l\u2011ar constitui reprezentarea colectiv\u0103<\/em>, un \u201eprodus al asocierii pasive a impresiilor venite prin sim\u0163uri\u201d. Ea ar fi un fel de rudiment al viitoarei no\u0163iuni, fiind ca \u015fi aceasta un rezultat al unei unit\u0103\u0163i sintetice, dar nu a intelectului, ci a \u201eintui\u0163iei naive\u201d. Pe plan judicativ s-ar petrece tot felul de asocieri \u00eentre reprezent\u0103ri cu suport real \u015fi reprezent\u0103ri fictive ale unor for\u0163e, puteri etc. ireale, iar pe plan inferen\u0163ial ar ap\u0103rea un fel de condi\u0163ionare fictiv\u0103. S-ar conchide de la efecte reale la cauze imaginare prin ignorarea oric\u0103rei experien\u0163e. Un rol esen\u0163ial \u00een dep\u0103\u015firea acestei faze a dezvolt\u0103rii g\u00e2ndirii o constituie limbajul.<\/em><\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Datul nemijlocit \u0219i circularitatea pre-judicativ\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Viorel Cernica<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 16\u201328]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The author attempts to reveal some characteristics of the concept of given as Romanian philosopher Mircea Florian treats it in his early texts. The main argument of this interpretation goes to the idea that the two hypostases of the given \u2013 unmediated<\/em> and mediated<\/em> \u2013 appear formally as a pre-judicative circularity. Conse\u00adquently, there is a movement of the thought regarding this concept that implies not only knowledge judgments, but also the signs of a nonjudicative experience. The (infinite) judgment \u2013 The given is non-determined<\/em> \u2013 includes in its structure both elements: nonjudicative experience and judicative form. This is why the concept of given seems to be contradictory in Florian\u2019s philosophy. The author of this paper emphasises also the idea about the philosophical meaning of difference between these two hypostases of the given<\/em>. Finally, the author shows some directions of research regarding Florian\u2019s philosophy, starting from (infinite) judgment abovementioned.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru \u0219i proiectul pozitivist al psihologiei ca \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Constantin Stoenescu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 29\u201342]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

My aim in this paper is to argue that C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru was in his book Puterea sufleteasc\u0103<\/em> [The Power of Soul] very close to the positivist approach of psychology. I support the thesis that Motru not only had a good understanding of the project developed by Comte and Mill, but he also tried to use and integrate creatively, especially Mill\u2019s ideas, into his own approach. Moreover, I propose the historical inter\u00adpre\u00adtation that Motru didn\u2019t leave his own initial positivist methodological frame\u00adwork, but he tried to develop it inside the more complex vision of a method\u00adolog\u00adical pluralism.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Elemente de metafizic\u0103<\/em>: Ce \u00een\u021belegea R\u0103dulescu-Motru prin \u201econ\u0219tiin\u021b\u0103\u201d?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mona Mamulea<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 43\u201355]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

As a student in Wundt\u2019s laboratory R\u0103dulescu-Motru witnessed the birth of experimental psychology, linked to a paradigm shift in the under\u00adstanding of psyche. The following paper examines his Elemente de metafizic\u0103<\/em> (1912) in order to uncover and clarify the concept of consciousness he employed in his metaphysical thought.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Modelul perfec\u021bion\u0103rii umane \u00een lucr\u0103rile personalismului energetic. Partea I: Puterea sufleteasc\u0103<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrei Posea<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 56\u201368]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

My intention is to argue for a new way of interpreting C.\u00a0R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u2019s metaphysical theory by supporting the idea that his philosophical system provides us with a resourceful and useful model of self-improvement, which is recog\u00adnizable in each R\u0103du\u00adlescu-Motru\u2019s work related to energetic personalism. The present study focusses on the first book of the energetic personalism series: Puterea sufleteasc\u0103<\/em> (The power of the soul).<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Con\u0219tiin\u021ba, co-evolu\u021bia \u0219i memetica: o investiga\u021bie pornind de la C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Henrieta Ani\u0219oara \u0218erban<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 69\u201380]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In this study we correlate the concepts of consciousness and coevolution, starting from the idea of consciousness as discussed by C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru. We investigate the concepts of mnemes and memes (the latter as proposed by Richard Dawkins and interpreted by Daniel Dennett) in the light of two different understandings of consciousness: as a result of evolution, with emphasis on coevo\u00adlution, and as \u201cacknowledgement together\u201d, i.e.<\/em> as common, shared knowledge.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Problema dialogului interior \u00eentre con\u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u0219i fiin\u021b\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Victor E. Gelan<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 81\u201395]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

This paper analyzes the problem of the inner dialogue as it emerges from the philosophy of Mihai \u0218ora as placed at the crosroads between the problem of being and consciousness, respectively ontology and anthropology. One theme that is responsible for bridging the problem of being with that of anthropology in \u0218ora\u2019s thought is the issue of consciousness. In this sense, any inquiry concerning the human takes place by reference to a (particular) consciousness, which is able to know and apprehend the existence of world. At the same time, Mihai \u0218ora\u2019s view on the human being can be understood by reference to his own ontological model, which aims to approach, analyze and discuss in detail the entire problem of being, that is ontology. There\u00adfore, what I am aiming to present and critically address in this work deals with the manner in which the relation between being and consciousness gets constituted within \u0218ora\u2019s perspective of the inner dialogue.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Emil Cioran sau universalitatea con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ioan Dr\u0103goi<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 96\u2013107]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In this paper the author takes a closer look to Emil Cioran\u2019s concept of consciousness. Since consciousness is a traditional concept of philosophy and Cioran criticized philosophical thinking, first of all we need to clarify the meaning in which the term is employed in Cioran\u2019s work. According to Cioran\u2019s metaphysical suggestion, consciousness is opposed to nature and a symptom of dissolution. Cioran\u2019s model of consciousness will be described in terms of a path from subjectivity to universality, which is also a path to redemption.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Prefaceri ale con\u0219tiin\u021bei \u00een opera filosofilor rom\u00e2ni. C\u00e2teva provoc\u0103ri<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antologie de Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 109\u2013125]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
2. STUDII \u0218I ESEURI<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Mihai Eminescu \u2013 130 de ani de la intrarea \u00een eternitate: Perspective filosofico-metafizice asupra con\u0219tiin\u021bei creatoare<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ionu\u021b Isac<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 129\u2013147]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The anniversary of 130 years since the departure of Mihai Eminescu requires a philosophical and metaphysical re-thinking of what the creating conscious\u00adness of a genius represents for the local and global posterity. Accordingly, it is appropriate to draw attention to a series of quasi-ignored philosophical and meta\u00adphysical views through which Eminescu\u2019s work acquired new cultural signi\u00adfications. We have in mind the standpoints of Mircea Florian, Dumitru Isac, P. P. Negulescu, Constantin Noica, and Mihai Dr\u0103g\u0103nescu. They will be analytically exposed in the following article.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Orizontul \u00eentreb\u0103rii \u0219i sentimentul rom\u00e2nesc al fiin\u021bei la Constantin Noica<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0218erban N. Nicolau<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 148\u2013154]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The article presents Constantin Noica’s theory on the philosophical virtues of the Romanian language that allowed it to shape a specific model of Being.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Crea\u021bie \u0219i cunoa\u0219tere: Rembrandt \u0219i Br\u00e2ncu\u0219i<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mihai Popa<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 155\u2013171]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The objects or faces of Rembrandt\u2019s or Brancusi\u2019s works discussed in this article, and the works of art at large do not belong to reality, nor are they aesthetic pretexts embraced by the imagination that transfigures them; they are appear\u00adances in the sense of intuition of a surreality in the poiesis<\/em> area. Therefore, the work of art is not an effort to reproduce the model exactly, even less an objective production with aesthetic attributes, it is a poetic vision lived and thought by the artist, having the abstract (sometimes metaphysical) attributes of a surreality to which the imagination of its creator has access.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Istoriografia lui B. P. Hasdeu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marian Nencescu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 172\u2013178]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The following article examines Hasdeu\u2019s effort to develop a historiography in the spirit and with the conceptual support of European historical science of his time. Although he only managed to draw the sketch of his more extensive agenda, his \u201ecritical history\u201d asked valuable questions regarding not only the Romanian history, but also the methods of the historical science.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
3. SEMNAL<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti \u00een anul 2018<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bibliografie de Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 181\u2013183]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

1. PROBLEMA CON\u0218TIIN\u021aEI Logica genetic\u0103 a lui C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 11\u201315] Datul nemijlocit \u0219i circularitatea pre-judicativ\u0103 Viorel Cernica [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 16\u201328] C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru \u0219i proiectul pozitivist […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"right-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[341],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5117","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","category-sifr15"],"featured_image_src":null,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/mm\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"1. PROBLEMA CON\u0218TIIN\u021aEI Logica genetic\u0103 a lui C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 11\u201315] Datul nemijlocit \u0219i circularitatea pre-judicativ\u0103 Viorel Cernica [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XV: Problema con\u0219tiin\u021bei, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2019, pp. 16\u201328] C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru \u0219i proiectul pozitivist…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5117"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5117\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6061,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5117\/revisions\/6061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}