{"id":5165,"date":"2022-03-12T20:55:05","date_gmt":"2022-03-12T18:55:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/?page_id=5165"},"modified":"2022-03-18T22:51:20","modified_gmt":"2022-03-18T20:51:20","slug":"volumul-14-2018","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/volumul-14-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumul 14 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Not\u0103 asupra edi\u021biei<\/h6>\n\n\n
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
1. INTELECT, RA\u021aIUNE SPECULA\u021aIUNE<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Intelect, Ra\u021biune, Specula\u021biune<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 13\u201320]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In order to explain the irreconcilable disagreements within philosophy, the following paper argues for a tripartite theory of thinking based on three kinds of logic: of understanding, of reason, and of speculation.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Intelect, ra\u021biune, spirit. De la ra\u021bionalismul clasic la g\u00e2ndirea speculativ\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alexandru Boboc<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 21\u201330]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The following paper traces the odyssey of three paradigmatic concepts \u2013 understanding, reason, and spirit \u2013 that determined the modernity of the European culture.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Analogia ca form\u0103 esen\u021bial\u0103 a g\u00e2ndirii naturale din intelect, ra\u021biune \u0219i specula\u021biune<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ioan Biri\u0219<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 31\u201345]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Nowadays it is usually considered that we have two research codes: one digital and one analogous. But the reality to be researched is rather \u201ccontinuous\u201d than separated in \u201crigid\u201d categories. That’s why analogue language seems more appropriate on a continuous scale of natural thinking in the process of knowing. Ultimately, one cannot go beyond analogy, because the analogical terms are the very condition of the possibility of conceptual thinking, the ultimate \u201cunity\u201d of thinking. But the thinking has three main faculties (Alexandru Surdu): understanding, reason and speculation. Although these faculties can be described and treated differently (in a more didactic perspective), the present study attempts to capture the continuity between them through analogy, which gives a certain unity to the faculties of thinking.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Logica intelectului, logica ra\u021biunii \u0219i logica specula\u021biunii<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marius Dobre<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 46\u201358]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The logic of understanding is \u201cthe theory of the forms of shaping (outlining and representing) of the states of affaires\u201d. It is identifiable in the so-called symbolic or mathematical logic, and employs a symbolic language at the linguistic level. The logic of reason is \u201cthe theory of the abstract and generalized forms of reflection of perceivable objects, psychologically realized through contemplation and reflection\u201d. It makes use of a notional language, being recognizable in the classical, or traditional, logic. The logic of speculative thinking is a formal theory whose logical forms are categories in various oppositional relations.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Prejudec\u0103\u021bile \u0219i \u201eexperien\u021ba ra\u021bional\u0103\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Viorel Cernica<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 59\u201370]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The author attempts to describe the conditions of a \u201crational experience\u201d. First, the concept of experience is understood in terms of its relationship with a \u201csubject\u201d as an individual in flesh and bones. Second, the term \u201crational\u201d is related to the significance of \u201creason\u201d as a faculty of forms. The so-called \u201erational experience\u201d involves the metamorphosis of a judgment as a logical form into a pre-judgment, or prejudice (through a process of subjectivizing), and then again into a judgment with a constitutive role in a new discourse (through a process of de-constituting).<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Facult\u0103\u021bile min\u021bii \u0219i facult\u0103\u021bile g\u00e2ndirii. De la maiorescieni la Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mona Mamulea<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 71\u201387]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The article intends to explain the negative impact the faculty psychology had on Maiorescu\u2019s disciples by investigating a set of philosophical assumptions that underlie their thought. The Romanian debate on mind faculties comes to a turning point with Alexandru Surdu’s logical approach that overcomes the difficulties of the essentialist metaphysics and offers an explanation for the occurence of disagreements within philosophy.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Limitele ra\u021biunii \u00een filosofia speculativ\u0103 a lui Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Henrieta Ani\u0219oara \u0218erban<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 88\u2013102]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The following paper approaches the relationship between reason and speculative philosophy starting from the investigation of speculative thinking in the work of the Romanian contemporary philosopher Alexandru Surdu, titled G\u00e2ndirea speculativ\u0103: coordonate istorico-sistematice (2001). While emphasizing the main aspects of the relationship between reason and speculative thought, the present investigation proceeds to identify the limits of reason within the tripartite theory of thinking, as was developed by Alexandru Surdu.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune. Poiesis <\/em>\u0219i metafizic\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mihai Popa<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 103\u2013110<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The alignment with transcendence, whose meaning we seek in our individual existence, means metaphysical anxiety, which cannot be realized (only) as cognitive self, but as poietic self. Poiesis is the transcendence of the self, the exit from the self, from the isolation of the subject, which can never be creative in itself, but must be complete in the sense of Creation.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Despre intelect, ra\u021biune \u0219i specula\u021biune, \u00een filosofia rom\u00e2neasc\u0103. Mic\u0103 antologie, cu sublinieri<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 111\u2013136]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
2. PROVOC\u0102RI ALE FILOSOFIEI PENTADICE<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Ideea de transcenden\u021b\u0103 \u0219i perspectiva pentadic\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florea Lucaci<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 139\u2013153]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Alexandru Surdu’s approach is an extensive dialogue with the history of Romanian and world philosophy. In a Hegelian spirit, Alexandru Surdu argues that the dialectico-speculative logic is able to go beyond the limits of the formal exercise, becoming an organon of philosophy and of culture in general. In this capacity, logic is capable to bring into harmony the categories that account for the real existence of man and his world.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Arta ca amprent\u0103 a m\u00e2inii<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rodica Croitoru<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 154\u2013163]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

While outlining the ideas at the core of Alexandru Surdu\u2019s Pentamorphosis of Art, the following article runs through the creative dynamics of numbers as explanatory patterns of world and human being.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Despre metoda aferezei la Br\u00e2ncu\u0219i \u0219i Noica. Pornind de la o interpretare a lui Al. Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oana Vasilescu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 164\u2013177]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Following the lead of Alexandru Surdu\u2019s interpretation, our paper attempts to emphasize the way that aphaeresis as method works within the philosophical and artistic areas, through investigating some features of Constantin Noica\u2019s hermeneutics and of Constantin Brancusi\u2019s view on art.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
3. RESTITUIRI<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Dumitru Isac \u2013 reflexii de \u201eviziune integral\u0103\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ionu\u021b Isac<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 181\u2013182]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dumitru Isac, Reflexii metafizice<\/em> (I)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 183\u2013193]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
4. SEMNAL<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti \u00een 2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bibliografie de Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 197\u2013201]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Not\u0103 asupra edi\u021biei 1. INTELECT, RA\u021aIUNE SPECULA\u021aIUNE Intelect, Ra\u021biune, Specula\u021biune Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 13\u201320] Intelect, ra\u021biune, spirit. De la ra\u021bionalismul clasic la g\u00e2ndirea speculativ\u0103 Alexandru Boboc [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"right-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[343],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5165","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","category-sifr14"],"featured_image_src":null,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/mm\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Not\u0103 asupra edi\u021biei 1. INTELECT, RA\u021aIUNE SPECULA\u021aIUNE Intelect, Ra\u021biune, Specula\u021biune Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 13\u201320] Intelect, ra\u021biune, spirit. De la ra\u021bionalismul clasic la g\u00e2ndirea speculativ\u0103 Alexandru Boboc [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5165"}],"version-history":[{"count":72,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5165\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5545,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5165\/revisions\/5545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}