{"id":5546,"date":"2022-03-13T20:24:37","date_gmt":"2022-03-13T18:24:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/?page_id=5546"},"modified":"2022-03-18T22:52:50","modified_gmt":"2022-03-18T20:52:50","slug":"volume-14-2018","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/volume-14-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 14 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Editorial note<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
1. UNDERSTANDING, REASON, AND SPECULATION<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Understanding, Reason, and Speculation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 13\u201320]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In order to explain the irreconcilable disagreements within philosophy, the following paper argues for a tripartite theory of thinking based on three kinds of logic: of understanding, of reason, and of speculation.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Understanding, reason, and spirit. From classical rationalism to speculative thinking<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alexandru Boboc<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 21\u201330]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The following paper traces the odyssey of three paradigmatic concepts \u2013 understanding, reason, and spirit \u2013 that determined the modernity of the European culture.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Analogy as an essential form of natural thinking in understanding, reason, and speculation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ioan Biri\u0219<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 31\u201345]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Nowadays it is usually considered that we have two research codes: one digital and one analogous. But the reality to be researched is rather \u201ccontinuous\u201d than separated in \u201crigid\u201d categories. That’s why analogue language seems more appropriate on a continuous scale of natural thinking in the process of knowing. Ultimately, one cannot go beyond analogy, because the analogical terms are the very condition of the possibility of conceptual thinking, the ultimate \u201cunity\u201d of thinking. But the thinking has three main faculties (Alexandru Surdu): understanding, reason and speculation. Although these faculties can be described and treated differently (in a more didactic perspective), the present study attempts to capture the continuity between them through analogy, which gives a certain unity to the faculties of thinking.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Logic of understanding, logic of reason, and logic of speculative thinking<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marius Dobre<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 46\u201358]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The logic of understanding is \u201cthe theory of the forms of shaping (outlining and representing) of the states of affaires\u201d. It is identifiable in the so-called symbolic or mathematical logic, and employs a symbolic language at the linguistic level. The logic of reason is \u201cthe theory of the abstract and generalized forms of reflection of perceivable objects, psychologically realized through contemplation and reflection\u201d. It makes use of a notional language, being recognizable in the classical, or traditional, logic. The logic of speculative thinking is a formal theory whose logical forms are categories in various oppositional relations.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Prejudices and \u201crational experience\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Viorel Cernica<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 59\u201370]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The author attempts to describe the conditions of a \u201crational experience\u201d. First, the concept of experience is understood in terms of its relationship with a \u201csubject\u201d as an individual in flesh and bones. Second, the term \u201crational\u201d is related to the significance of \u201creason\u201d as a faculty of forms. The so-called \u201erational experience\u201d involves the metamorphosis of a judgment as a logical form into a pre-judgment, or prejudice (through a process of subjectivizing), and then again into a judgment with a constitutive role in a new discourse (through a process of de-constituting).<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Faculties of mind and faculties of thinking: From Maiorescu\u2019s School to Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mona Mamulea<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 71\u201387]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The article intends to explain the negative impact the faculty psychology had on Maiorescu\u2019s disciples by investigating a set of philosophical assumptions that underlie their thought. The Romanian debate on mind faculties comes to a turning point with Alexandru Surdu’s logical approach that overcomes the difficulties of the essentialist metaphysics and offers an explanation for the occurence of disagreements within philosophy.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

The limits of reason within Alexandru Surdu\u2019s speculative philosophy<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Henrieta Ani\u0219oara \u0218erban<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 88\u2013102]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The following paper approaches the relationship between reason and speculative philosophy starting from the investigation of speculative thinking in the work of the Romanian contemporary philosopher Alexandru Surdu, titled G\u00e2ndirea speculativ\u0103: coordonate istorico-sistematice (2001). While emphasizing the main aspects of the relationship between reason and speculative thought, the present investigation proceeds to identify the limits of reason within the tripartite theory of thinking, as was developed by Alexandru Surdu.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Understanding, reason, and speculation. Poiesis<\/em> and metaphysics<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mihai Popa<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 103\u2013110<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The alignment with transcendence, whose meaning we seek in our individual existence, means metaphysical anxiety, which cannot be realized (only) as cognitive self, but as poietic self. Poiesis is the transcendence of the self, the exit from the self, from the isolation of the subject, which can never be creative in itself, but must be complete in the sense of Creation.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

On understanding, reason, and speculation within Romanian philosophy. A brief anthology with highlights<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 111\u2013136]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
2. CHALLENGES OF THE PENTADIC PHILOSOPHY<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

The idea of transcendence and the pentadic viewpoint<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Florea Lucaci<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 139\u2013153]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Alexandru Surdu’s approach is an extensive dialogue with the history of Romanian and world philosophy. In a Hegelian spirit, Alexandru Surdu argues that the dialectico-speculative logic is able to go beyond the limits of the formal exercise, becoming an organon of philosophy and of culture in general. In this capacity, logic is capable to bring into harmony the categories that account for the real existence of man and his world.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Art as a handprint<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rodica Croitoru<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 154\u2013163]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

While outlining the ideas at the core of Alexandru Surdu\u2019s Pentamorphosis of Art, the following article runs through the creative dynamics of numbers as explanatory patterns of world and human being.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

On aphaeresis with Brancusi and Noica. Starting from an interpretation by Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oana Vasilescu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 164\u2013177]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Following the lead of Alexandru Surdu\u2019s interpretation, our paper attempts to emphasize the way that aphaeresis as method works within the philosophical and artistic areas, through investigating some features of Constantin Noica\u2019s hermeneutics and of Constantin Brancusi\u2019s view on art.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
3. RESTITUTIO<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Dumitru Isac \u2013 Reflections of a \u201eholistic view\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ionu\u021b Isac<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 181\u2013182]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metaphysical reflections <\/em>(I) (by Dumitru Isac)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 183\u2013193]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
4. SEMNAL<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

The history of Romanian philosophy in 2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A bibliography by Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 197\u2013201]<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Download<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Editorial note 1. UNDERSTANDING, REASON, AND SPECULATION Understanding, Reason, and Speculation Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 13\u201320] Understanding, reason, and spirit. From classical rationalism to speculative thinking Alexandru Boboc [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"right-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[338],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5546","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","category-sifr14-en-en"],"featured_image_src":null,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/mm\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Editorial note 1. UNDERSTANDING, REASON, AND SPECULATION Understanding, Reason, and Speculation Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2018, pp. 13\u201320] Understanding, reason, and spirit. From classical rationalism to speculative thinking Alexandru Boboc [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XIV: Intelect, ra\u021biune, specula\u021biune, Bucure\u015fti, Editura…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5546"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5882,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5546\/revisions\/5882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}