{"id":8455,"date":"2020-11-16T20:20:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-16T18:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/?page_id=8455"},"modified":"2024-07-16T19:41:46","modified_gmt":"2024-07-16T17:41:46","slug":"volumul-11-2015","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/volumul-11-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Volumul 11 (2015)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
I. LUCIAN BLAGA, 120 DE ANI DE LA NA\u0218TERE<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
1. FILOSOFIA CULTURII<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Ondula\u021biunea universal\u0103 \u0219i sufletul rom\u00e2nesc<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Alexandru Surdu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 11\u201318]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

According to Lucian Blaga, the unconscious spatial horizon \u201creaches, with its
undulations, up under the arches of consciousness.\u201d Blaga calls this process \u201cpersonance\u201d (personan\u021b\u0103), i.e. something that is done by resounding and determines \u201cthe vibrations of the consciousness.\u201d Between all these, \u201cchords\u201d or \u201cdiscords\u201d may occur. This is the moment, at least terminologically, when can be established the connection with Vasile Conta\u2019s theory of undulation, and with Constantin Noica\u2019s considerations about wave, and even with \u015etefan Odobleja\u2019s logics of resonance.
Keywords<\/strong>: universal undulation; stylistic matrix; wave; \u201cMioritic Space\u201d.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Filosofia lui Blaga: \u00eentre alian\u021be \u015fi limbaj<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ion Dur<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 19\u201331]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

Within the context of European philosophy and culture, Lucian Blaga\u2019s
metaphysics continues to score an outstanding axiological performance, by which the space of Romanian spirituality earns its accreditation. That is the main reason for undertaking an analysis of Blaga\u2019s philosophical heritage, which could testify for the today\u2019s impact of a philosophical approach, as well as for its keeping synchronous with the similar contemporary European projects. This paper aims at drawing attention to the contributions made by pre-1989 research to the better understanding of Blaga\u2019s philosophy, as well as to the merits of the efforts made in the past quarter of a century in order to shed light on the intricacies of his discourse. The goal of the paper is also to invite a more detailed assessment of Blaga\u2019s philosophical heritage, in view of its alliances established with literature and theology, as well as in view of the metaphorical language in which the philosopher had his metaphysical works articulated. Light is shed, especially, on the peculiarities of the philosophical idiom that the philosopher invested in his aphorisms (in Discobolul<\/em>) and on the status of the metaphor that bifrons Blaga employed in his equal poet and philosopher\u2019s capacity.
Keywords<\/strong>: alliance with literature; alliance with theology; metaphorical language; image-concepts; metaphorical truth.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Aspecte ale fenomenului religios \u00een opera filosofic\u0103 a lui Lucian Blaga<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Eugeniu Nistor<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 32\u201344]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

As a thinker and metaphysician of world mysteries, but also of the depth of
human soul Lucian Blaga analysed in his philosophical system the manner in which human knowledge is funded, sometimes dependent on the dogma\u2019s resorts, also diverse religious typologies and their specific differences, due mostly \u2013 according to his demonstration \u2013 to some very refined categories of the stylistic matrix. Critical analysis of the main religions of the world and the equality mark placed between their values make up and put into evidence a very modern vision on the religious phenomenon, vision which, after more than half a century, did not lose its significance and it is still of current interest.
Keywords<\/strong>: philosophic system; religious values; dogmatic aeon; sophianic sentiment; bipolar spiritualities.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Crea\u021bia tradi\u021bional\u0103 \u015fi identitatea rom\u00e2neasc\u0103. Reflec\u021bii pe marginea lucr\u0103rii Orizont \u015fi stil<\/em> a lui Lucian Blaga<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Mihai Popa<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 45\u201352]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

The aim of this insight in Lucian Blaga\u2019s philosophy of style is establishing
a connection between the traditional creation in the Romanian culture and the permanence of the factors that configure stylistically the works (most of them anonymous \u2013 so from the beginning they should be integrated in a collective work). We do not discuss each factor, or their relation, but only those that we believe are responsible for this Romanian horizon of creation, and which could be invoked in the view of identifying some generic characters. If we take into account the formative aspiration (or nisus formativus<\/em>, according to Blaga\u2019s context), for the Romanian traditional terminology there should be analyzed in this sense the phenomenal<\/em> mode possibly the typifying<\/em> one. The former seems to be responsible especially for the plastic forms of the old art, but also for the genres of the literary creation, where a certain schematism (geometrical, spiritualizing, in the purest sense of the art that plasticizes an image reducing it to its essential characters) can convince us to search in the works of our creators the immutable influence of the transcendent.
Keywords<\/strong>: style; traditional creation; formative aspiration; unconscious; art.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
2. EPISTEMOLOGIE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
O voce care nu a fost auzit\u0103: Lucian Blaga \u015fi reorientarea istoric\u0103 a filosofiei \u015ftiin\u021bei<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Mircea Flonta<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 53\u201364]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

That regulative ideas concerning the requirements of scientific description and explanation of nature radically changed when a significant research tradition was replaced by another is a main feature of the so called \u201ehistorical shift\u201d in the philosophy of science. In the following paper, I aim to point out and debate several outstanding anticipations of this shift that occurred in Blaga\u2019s historico-philosophical works published in the first half of the 20th century. Essentially, this is about the thesis that the stylistic patterns of historical cultures determine the requirements of description and explanation of nature that distinguish great research traditions one from the other. The importance and topicality of Blaga\u2019s considerations is outlined by comparison with those of some remarkable figures of the new philosophy of science: Al. Koyr\u00e9, St. Toulmin, and Th. Kuhn.
Keywords<\/strong>: scientific research tradition; ideal of description and explanation of nature; cultural determination of the ideals of description and explanation of nature; scientific revolution as a change of the ideals of description and explanation.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Lucian Blaga despre rolul metodologic al analogiei \u00een formarea conceptelor<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ioan Biri\u0219<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 65\u201377]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

The problem of analogy returns to the attention of philosophers especially
after 1970. Our study starts from the hypothesis that the analogy is a natural form of human thought. For this reason the Romanian philosopher Lucian Blaga believes that we need a metaphysical foundation of the analogy. This foundation uses two principles: 1) the lack of common ancestry; 2) a sufficient or minimal arrangement to obtain homogeneity.
Keywords<\/strong>: analogy; plus-knowledge; minus-knowledge; models of analogy; metaphysics of analogy.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Critica f\u0103cut\u0103 de St\u0103niloae teoriei lui Blaga despre cunoa\u015fterea prin revela\u021bie<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Constantin Stoenescu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 78\u201389]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

Dumitru St\u0103niloae published in 1942 a brochure in which he tried to provide
a strong criticism to Blaga\u2019s theory of knowledge based on philosophical concepts like negative knowledge, mystery and transcendent censure. This theory is labelled by St\u0103niloae as \u201epoetical Kantianism\u201d. My main statement in this paper is to argue that St\u0103niloae and Blaga share different paradigms regarding the relation between scientific and religious knowledge. St\u0103niloae argued that the two types of knowledge are in a hierarchical order, with the religious knowledge in the top because it assures the access to the totality of existence. Blaga claims that the two are different types of knowledge which have the possibility to reveal the mystery in different manners, to the extent that they can do it.
Keywords<\/strong>: Dumitru St\u0103niloae; Lucian Blaga; epistemology of religion; knowledge by revelation; scientific knowledge and religious knowledge.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Realitatea se \u00eentoarce: O presupozi\u021bie a lui Blaga despre raportul cunoa\u015ftere\u2013realitate<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Mona Mamulea<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 90\u201398]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

Prompted by the quantum revolution of the last century as well as by other scientific theories like Einstein\u2019s relativity and Driesch\u2019s entelechy, Blaga suggested an unconventional alternative epistemology which he thought to be more suited to explain the paradoxes that had occurred in certain scientific descriptions of reality. The following paper considers one of Blaga\u2019s rather silent hypotheses concerning the reality behind his theory of knowledge.
Keywords<\/strong>: Minus-cognition; paradox; wave-particle duality; reality; phenomenal reality.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
3. METAFIZIC\u0102 \u0218I COSMOLOGIE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Metafizica lui Lucian Blaga \u00een ipostaza unui \u201enou \u00eenceput\u201d<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Vasile Musc\u0103<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 99\u2013108]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

This essay debates the problem of Lucian Blaga\u2019s metaphysical system in
relation with Martin Heidegger\u2019s concept of \u201ca new beginning\u201d in philosophical thinking. According to the author, Blaga\u2019s metaphysical thoughts transcend the history of metaphysics and are part of a new way of thinking, the \u201cdogmatic\u201d way, which brings the philosophical quarrels concerning metaphysics to an end. Thus, his writings, often considered \u201cout of fashion\u201d in comparison with other philosophical movements of his time, can be also viewed as \u201cahead of their time\u201d.
Keywords<\/strong>: metaphysics; absolute; dogmatic; Heidegger; phenomenology.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Contra-mitul \u201eparadisului tragic\u201d. Despre t\u00e2lcul metafizic al cenzurii transcendente<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ionu\u021b Isac<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 109\u2013120]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

The paper is a re-focus on the \u201dtranscendent censorship\u201d concept in the
metaphysic system created by Lucian Blaga, from at least two perspectives: the motivation of its introduction in the discourse universe and the role it plays in the overall construction. We consider that Blaga introduced this concept for reasons that appeal both to the inherent need of the system he created and to its natural development manner, trilogy by trilogy, which was sometimes eluded by the exegesis. Also, our statement is that, despite some indisputable hermeneutic progress, the analytical-Kantian origin critics auto-forbids the sufficient incorporation of the \u201dmetaphysical wisdom\u201d of the transcenddent censorship, especially from the perspective of the \u201dmaximal methodological expansion\u201d, on which Blaga insists in his metaphysics of knowledge. But, the adequate understanding of the new methodology proposed by Blaga may also clarify the other aspects submitted to discussion.
Keywords<\/strong>: metaphysics of knowledge; ontology; metaphysical wisdom; transcendent censorship; the Great Anonymous.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Nega\u021bia la Mircea Vulc\u0103nescu \u015fi cunoa\u015fterea luciferic\u0103 blagian\u0103. \u00cent\u00e2lnirea a dou\u0103 orizonturi de interpretare a ethosului rom\u00e2nesc<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Cornel-Florin Moraru<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 121\u2013130]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

In this essay I tackle the problem of non-being in Mircea Vulc\u0103nescu\u2019s thinking
and put it in connection with Lucian Blaga\u2019s concept of \u201eluciferian knowledge\u201d. The \u201eluciferian\u201d character of the concept of non-being gives negation a qualitative meaning, not an existential one, making it define the differences between the absolute and the factic, on one hand, and between various categories on the other. From this point of view, non-being and negation become key-concepts in Vulc\u0103nescu\u2019s ontology because they are active in the constitution of the whole realm of existence and they predetermine human understanding of the world.
Keywords<\/strong>: non-being; existence; luciferian knowledge; phenomenology; meontology.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Pozi\u021bia lui Lucian Blaga fa\u021b\u0103 de fenomenologie<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ioan Dr\u0103goi<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 131\u2013142]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

This essay aims to reconsider L. Blaga\u2019s dispute over phenomenology. Blaga\u2019s
debate is analyzed in line with the conflictual perspective in which the phenomenological viewpoint and metaphysical constructs are incompatible. Blaga\u2019s thinking could be associated with the metaphysical condition of \u2018philosophical system\u2019, while for phenomenology it is \u2018experience\u2019 that prevails. Following this distinction, the Romanian philosopher\u2019s arguments against phenomenology are analysed in the light of their motivations depicted in I.Bruc\u0103r\u2019s \u2018phenomenological\u2019 interpretation of Blaga\u2019s philosophical works.
Keywords<\/strong>: metaphysics; phenomenology; experience; philosophical system; Blaga; Husserl; Heidegger; Bruc\u0103r.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
4. BLAGA \u00ceN TRADUCERE<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Despre ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 a traduce filosofia lui Blaga \u00een german\u0103. M\u0103rturia unui traduc\u0103tor austriac <\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Traducere din limba german\u0103 de Mihai Andrei Todoca]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rainer Schubert<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 143\u2013154]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tFragment<\/span><\/div>

Traducerea \u00een limba german\u0103 ar trebui s\u0103 pun\u0103 pre\u021b pe aducerea \u00een mod corespunz\u0103tor la expresie a procesualit\u0103\u021bii cunoa\u015fterii. De\u015fi limba german\u0103 are posibilitatea de a constr\u00e2nge \u00eentr-un substantiv unic, prin inversarea ordinii asert\u0103rii, procesualitatea \u015fi obiectul con\u0143inut \u00een ea, a\u015fa cum se \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103 \u00een cazurile atestate de cuvinte precum \u201eTextverarbeitung\u201d (= prelucrare de text), \u201eGartengestaltung\u201d (= amenajarea gr\u0103dinii), \u201eDatenauswertung\u201d (= evaluare de date) etc., totu\u015fi \u00een cazul cuv\u00e2ntului \u201eProblemstellung\u201d trebuie preferat\u0103 succesiunea de cuvinte din sintagma original\u0103 \u201epunerea problemei\u201d \u2013 prin urmare, \u00een textul german vom vorbi despre \u201eStellung des Problems\u201d, pentru ca verbul \u201estellen\u201d (= a pune), care a fost ridicat la rangul de substantiv, s\u0103 reliefeze c\u00e2t mai bine \u00eendeplinirea ac\u021biunii cunoa\u015fterii. Prin aceea c\u0103 \u201epunem\u201d o problem\u0103, noi facem ceva. E drept c\u0103 aceast\u0103 traducere cuv\u00e2nt cu cuv\u00e2nt sun\u0103 greoi \u00een german\u0103 \u015fi nici nu este frecvent folosit\u0103, dar face dreptate unei circumstan\u021be cruciale \u2013 aceea c\u0103 Blaga \u00een\u021belege \u201epunerea problemei\u201d drept o s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fire, care are un \u00eenceput, un \u201e\u00een timp ce\u201d \u015fi un sf\u00e2r\u015fit ale sale. C\u00e2t de important\u0103 este aici precizia traducerii ne este ar\u0103tat, \u00een schimb, de limba englez\u0103, \u00een care distinc\u021bia dintre a cunoa\u015fte, ca proces, \u015fi cunoa\u015ftere, ca rezultat al acestuia, este complet \u015ftears\u0103 \u00een expresia \u201etheory of knowledge\u201d, astfel c\u0103 \u201eteoria cunoa\u015fterii\u201d la Blaga, \u00een loc s\u0103 devin\u0103 o \u201eteorie a cunoa\u015fterii\u201d, devine o \u201eteorie a lui \u00aba \u015fti\u00bb\u201d. \u201eA cunoa\u015fte\u201d \u015fi \u201ea \u015fti\u201d sunt \u00eens\u0103 foarte diferite, tot a\u015fa cum \u201econstruirea unei case\u201d este diferit\u0103 de \u201ecasa gata construit\u0103\u201d.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Lucian Blaga despre diferen\u021ba dintre culturile minore \u015fi cele majore [cu un fragment din Fiin\u021ba istoric\u0103<\/em>, capitolul 3]<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Traducere din limba englez\u0103 de Ovidiu G. Grama]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Michael S. Jones<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 155\u2013164]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tFragment<\/span><\/div>

Atunci c\u00e2nd Blaga a introdus, \u00een Trilogia culturii<\/em>, distinc\u021bia dintre culturile \u201emajore\u201d \u015fi cele \u201eminore\u201d, mul\u021bi l-au \u00een\u021beles gre\u015fit, consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 face tocmai acest gen de distinc\u021bie evaluativ\u0103, de-a lungul liniilor trasate de predecesorii s\u0103i germani. Aceast\u0103 interpretare eronat\u0103 a provocat o reac\u021bie potrivnic\u0103 din partea unora, \u00eendeosebi atunci c\u00e2nd s-a remarcat c\u0103 Blaga a\u015fezase cultura rom\u00e2n\u0103 sub rubrica \u201eculturi minore\u201d. \u00cen fragmentul tradus aici \u00eel vedem pe Blaga r\u0103spunz\u00e2nd acestor critici. El exprim\u0103 cu claritate ceea ce crede c\u0103 ar fi trebuit s\u0103 fie evident pentru cititorul atent de la bun \u00eenceput, \u015fi anume c\u0103 distinc\u021bia pe care o face \u00eentre culturile majore \u015fi cele minore nu este evaluativ\u0103, ci descriptiv\u0103. \u015ei unele, \u015fi altele au mare valoare, dar din motive diferite. Cultura major\u0103 nu este mai valoroas\u0103 dec\u00e2t cultura minor\u0103. Iar cultura rom\u00e2n\u0103, cultura lui Blaga, are o mare valoare.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Bibliografie tematic\u0103<\/strong><\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Monografii, volume colective \u015fi antologii dedicate filosofiei lui Lucian Blaga <\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 165\u2013167]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
II. CATEGORII ALE FILOSOFIEI ROM\u00c2NE\u015eTI<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Antinomii metodologice \u00een epistemologie<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Teodor Dima<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 171\u2013175]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

The methodological antinomies of axiomatization and formalization, advanced
by Petre Botezatu in Valoarea deduc\u021biei <\/em>(The Value of Deduction, 1971), were first put forward in his doctoral thesis: Cauzalitatea fizic\u0103 \u015fi panquantismul<\/em> (Physical Causality and Panquantism, 1945) in various statements: \u201eWhat is gained through abstraction, through a scholarly technique, is lost in objectivity, through a detachment from the concrete reality\u201d, or \u201eThe advance in the profound knowledge of real causation leaves behind the methodical use of probability\u201d, or \u201eWhat is gained in terms of generality is lost in terms of objectivity\u201d. I have reached the conclusion that Petre Botezatu\u2019s initial concern was with epistemology, especially with the \u201eturn\u201d taken by the philosophy of physics after the revolutionary discoveries from the laboratories where the chemical elements were investigated in their intimate structures. The philosopher who, after his return to the university, in 1957, was mainly concerned with logic and metalogic, described with precision the epistemological procedures which helped clarify the principle of determinism in the philosophy of quantum physics.
Keywords<\/strong>: methodological antinomy; complementarity; determinism; quantum physics.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Categorie, concept intercultural \u015fi experien\u021b\u0103 filosofic\u0103<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Viorel Cernica<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 176\u2013184]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

In this paper, the author proposes a research on the difference between the
\u201ephilosophical category\u201d and the \u201eintercultural concept\u201d, from doxical, logical, and phenomenological perspective. Also, the passing of the philosophical category to an intercultural context, and the returning of the latter to its first function are themes in this paper. The arguments and the examples will support the conclusion of the author, namely the idea that the philosophical (new) experience decides in respect of this double passing.
Keywords<\/strong>: philosophical category; intercultural concept; philosophical experience; logic of the category and intercultural concept; modification of temporality.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
Interculturalitatea, \u00eentre practici filosofice reale, percep\u021bii culturalideologice \u015fi evalu\u0103ri metafilosofice. Studiu de caz: tr\u0103irea \u015fi tr\u0103irismul<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Constantin Aslam<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 185\u2013192]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

In this paper, the author proposes some terminological and comprehensive
elucidations of the concepts tr\u0103ire (experience) and tr\u0103irism (Weltanschauung based on experience). On this basis, he argues that the intercultural size of the Romanian philosophy is present and recognizable in all kinds of the reflexive discourse, including the themes exposed to the ideological interpretations of the philosophy.
Keywords<\/strong>: experience; philosophia perennis;<\/em> ingenium perenne<\/em>; Nae Ionescu; Mircea Vulc\u0103nescu; Lucre\u021biu P\u0103tr\u0103\u015fcanu.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
III. M\u0102RTURII<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Emil Cioran \u015fi Bucur \u021aincu [m\u0103rturii \u015fi documente]<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Marin Diaconu<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 195\u2013200]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tAbstract<\/span><\/div>

Emil Cioran and Bucur \u0142incu friendship is the longest in the life of the
philosopher on the heights of despair. This friendship started in the childhood, while playing, continued at school, and became even stronger during the university years and during the courses of specialization, unrelenting over time, when they were separated by thousands of kilometers and ideological fears.
Keywords<\/strong>: friendship; memories; melancholy.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
IV. RESTITUIRI<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Dumitru Isac, \u201eLucian Blaga, filosof al culturii\u201d (text inedit)<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 203\u2013212]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tFragment<\/span><\/div>

Punem \u00een prim plan teoria sa despre matricea stilistic\u0103 abisal\u0103. \u00cen explica\u021bia unei culturi \u015fi \u00een esen\u021bialul ei st\u0103 factorul \u201estil\u201d, care la r\u00e2ndul s\u0103u este crea\u021bia unor func\u021biuni de natur\u0103 abisal\u0103. Adapt\u00e2nd o viziune kantian\u0103 a problemei, Blaga pune accent deosebit pe factorul \u201eincon\u015ftient\u201d, c\u0103ruia \u00eei acord\u0103 acelea\u015fi puteri creatoare pe care Kant le acordase con\u015ftiin\u021bei<\/em>, ba chiar mai mari. Astfel, \u00een viziunea lui Blaga, spiritul uman cuprinde un subsol bogat \u00eenzestrat cu for\u021be creatoare \u015fi modelatoare pentru \u00eentreaga crea\u021bie cultural\u0103. Acest subsol, pe care Blaga \u00eel doteaz\u0103, printr-o ipotez\u0103 construit\u0103 prin analogie kantian\u0103, cu o garnitur\u0103 de func\u021biuni categoriale, prinde, \u00een ochii s\u0103i, o importan\u021b\u0103 crucial\u0103 pentru fiin\u021ba uman\u0103. Func\u021biunile \u015fi factorii de care dispune incon\u015ftientul se afl\u0103 configura\u021bi \u00eentr-o constela\u021bie, form\u00e2nd o matrice stilistic\u0103<\/em>. \u00centre categoriile incon\u015ftientului \u015fi cele ale con\u015ftiin\u021bei exist\u0103 o rela\u021bie de para-coresponden\u021b\u0103, \u00een sensul c\u0103 unele categorii stilistice poart\u0103 oarecare paralelism cu cele con\u015ftiente, ele av\u00e2nd totu\u015fi o structur\u0103 aparte. Astfel, se va vorbi \u015fi de un spa\u021biu stilistic<\/em> care va avea, evident, o alt\u0103 structur\u0103 dec\u00e2t spa\u021biul con\u015ftiin\u021bei \u00een care se or\u00e2nduiesc datele sensibile.
Specificul categoriilor stilistice st\u0103 \u00een faptul c\u0103, pe c\u00e2nd cele ale con\u015ftiin\u021bei organizeaz\u0103 datele sim\u021burilor, ele vizeaz\u0103 misterele<\/em> \u015fi modeleaz\u0103 sau c\u0103l\u0103uzesc \u00eencerc\u0103rile revelatorii, teoretice sau de observa\u021bie dirijat\u0103. Ele marcheaz\u0103 o inten\u021bionalitate a abisalului c\u0103tre esen\u021ba misterelor, \u015fi \u00een aceast\u0103 tendin\u021b\u0103 de revelare poart\u0103 destinul \u00eenfr\u00e2n\u0103rii impuse de Marele Anonim. Este ceea ce cunoa\u015ftem din chiar teoria cuno\u015ftin\u021bei: Marele Anonim, misterul transcendent suprem, nu \u00eeng\u0103duie, din motive binecuv\u00e2ntate, ca omul s\u0103 ajung\u0103 la dezvelirea misterelor. \u015ei atunci aplic\u0103 \u00een con\u015ftiin\u021b\u0103, o cenzur\u0103<\/em>, iar \u00een c\u00e2mpul stilistic, o \u00eenfr\u00e2nare<\/em>. Categoriile ar fi, \u00een aceast\u0103 metafizic\u0103 semnifica\u021bie a lor, un fel de fr\u00e2ne transcendente prin care Marele Anonim fere\u015fte de ochiul p\u0103m\u00e2ntean priveli\u015ftea transcendent\u0103.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Constantin Noica, \u201ePentru o teorie a c\u00e2mpurilor logice\u201d (text inedit)<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 213\u2013268]<\/p>\n\n\n

\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\tCuprins<\/span><\/div>

Studiu introductiv. Categorie, c\u00e2mp, und\u0103 \u015fi semnifica\u021bia contemporan\u0103 a logicii (Drago\u015f Popescu<\/strong>) … 215
Not\u0103 asupra edi\u021biei (Drago\u015f Popescu<\/strong>) … 226
C. Noica<\/strong>, Pentru o teorie a c\u00e2mpurilor logice (text inedit) … 227
Index de termeni noicieni (Drago\u015f Popescu<\/strong>) … 268<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
V. SEMNAL<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Istoria filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti \u00een anul 2014<\/h5><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Bibliografie de Titus Lates<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em>, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere<\/em>, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 271\u2013272]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
<\/path><\/svg><\/span>
Descarc\u0103<\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I. LUCIAN BLAGA, 120 DE ANI DE LA NA\u0218TERE 1. FILOSOFIA CULTURII Ondula\u021biunea universal\u0103 \u0219i sufletul rom\u00e2nesc Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 11\u201318] Filosofia lui Blaga: \u00eentre alian\u021be \u015fi limbaj Ion Dur [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[412],"tags":[420],"class_list":["post-8455","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","category-sifr19","tag-lucian-blaga"],"featured_image_src":null,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/sifr\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"I. LUCIAN BLAGA, 120 DE ANI DE LA NA\u0218TERE 1. FILOSOFIA CULTURII Ondula\u021biunea universal\u0103 \u0219i sufletul rom\u00e2nesc Alexandru Surdu [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, vol. XI: Lucian Blaga, 120 de ani de la na\u0219tere, Bucure\u015fti, Editura Academiei Rom\u00e2ne, 2015, pp. 11\u201318] Filosofia lui Blaga: \u00eentre alian\u021be \u015fi limbaj Ion Dur [Studii de istorie a filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti,…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8455"}],"version-history":[{"count":84,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8545,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8455\/revisions\/8545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}