{"id":5002,"date":"2022-06-14T18:16:00","date_gmt":"2022-06-14T16:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/?p=5002"},"modified":"2024-01-24T17:27:04","modified_gmt":"2024-01-24T15:27:04","slug":"colocviul-national-ion-petrovici-10-iunie-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/colocviul-national-ion-petrovici-10-iunie-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Colocviul Na\u021bional \u201eIon Petrovici \u2013 50\u201d (10 iunie 2022, 10\u201315.30). Program"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t<\/span>Descarc\u0103 programul<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

10.00 | DESCHIDEREA LUCR\u0102RILOR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

10.05\u201310.20 | Viorel Cernica <\/strong>| Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne \/ Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie | Reprezent\u0103ri filosofice ale unit\u0103\u021bii existen\u021bei: prin credin\u021b\u0103 noetic\u0103 \u0219i credin\u021b\u0103 perceptiv\u0103<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In this paper, I propose an interpretation of Petrovici\u2019s philosophy and Ponty\u2019s philosophy, both of them structured in accordance with the concept of unity of existence (the world), itself given in a close relation with the idea about an existential subject. Each philosophy includes a representation of the unity of existence, founded, the first, in a spiritual conviction (noetic belief), and the second, in a perceptual faith. This representation is at the same time a privileged kind by which a subject enters the world. Also, I will propose arguments in order to legitimate the idea that each representation and its construction let themselves be led by the regulativity of a model of philosophizing: the philosophy of life (in the context of a metaphysics) \u2013 Petrovici; the existential philosophy (in a phenomenological context) \u2013 Ponty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/strong> noetic belief; perceptual faith; representation (of real-world unity); transcendence; lived world; Petrovici; Merleau-Ponty.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

10. 25\u201310.40 | Constantin Stoenescu <\/strong>| Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie| \u201eSpiritul \u0219tiin\u021bific\u201d \u0219i \u201espiritul filosofic\u201d \u00een viziunea lui Ion Petrovici<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The Romanian philosopher Ion Petrovici deals in his last study sent for publication during his life with the comparative analysis of \u201cthe philosophical spirit\u201d, \u201cthe scientific spirit\u201d and \u201cthe theological spirit\u201d. Censorship removed considerations about \u201cthe theological spirit\u201d. Petrovici characterizes \u201cthe philosophical spirit\u201d by the overall perspective it seeks and by its role in relation to scientific research. He also distinguishes between \u201cphilosophical spirit\u201d and philosophical doctrine. Finally, the similarities and differences between \u201cthe scientific spirit\u201d and \u201cthe philosophical spirit\u201d are analyzed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/strong> \u201cphilosophical spirit\u201d; \u201cscientific spirit\u201d; philosophical doctrine; speculative thinking; method of science.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

10.45\u201311.00 | Titus Lates<\/strong> | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne | Principiul incertitudinii \u015fi problema cauzalit\u0103\u0163ii<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The principle of uncertainty formulated by German physicist Werner Heisenberg in 1927 produced a stir in the scientific and philosophical world of the twentieth century, shaking the confidence in the value of determinism, causality, and definite foresight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ion Petrovici referred to this issue in a communication to the Romanian Academy in 1938. On this occasion he was in a polemical position towards the Romanian mathematician Vasile V\u00e2lcovici who, in a similar communication, also at the Romanian Academy, was of the opinion that determinism is an easy-to-reject conception, as well as towards the British astrophysicist Arthur Eddington, who saw in the crisis of determinism a triumph of religious faith.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Disproving the initiative of an indeterministic epistemology, Petrovici pays attention to the reformulations of the principle of causal determinism (such as that of the German philosopher Hermann Lotze) and joins the optimistic points of view expressed by prestigious scientists at the 9th<\/sup> International Congress of Philosophy in Paris (1937) on overcoming the crisis of determinism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, Petrovici asserts his confidence that the stringency of determinism will not be able to be banished on a secondary level but will be preserved in a form as refined and ethereal even in the world of supreme sources, indicating that even in transcendent regions it is not possible to ignore the deterministic vision without the risk of total darkness. As a final argument against those who proclaim indeterminism, Petrovici argues that they do not assert dogmatically their beliefs but strive to discuss the causes that led them to adhere to indeterminism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>\u00a0the principle of uncertainty; determinism; causality; prediction; a priori<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

11.05\u201311.20 | Marian-George Panait <\/strong>| Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne | <\/em><\/strong>Ion Petrovici \u0219i Alexandru Mironescu \u2013 utiliz\u0103ri ale termenului \u201eadev\u0103r<\/em><\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The purpose of this text is to emphasize the positioning \u2013 on account of the use of the term \u2018truth\u2019 \u2013 of philosophy, respectively theology concerning the metaphysical principle. I sketch an interpretative grid that I apply, as an illustration, to the uses of the term \u2018truth\u2019 in the theory of knowledge of Ion Petrovici and Alexandru Mironescu. At stake in the investigation is to reveal the difficulty that a person with both philosophical and theological commitments about the principle must face.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>philosophy; theology; knowledge; metaphysical principle; truth.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

11.25\u201311.40 | Mona Mamulea<\/strong> | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eC. R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne | Paralelismul psihofizic: metod\u0103 sau explica\u021bie<\/em>?<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The PhD dissertation defended by Ion Petrovici in 1905 triggered criticism related to its sources, method and aim. Although the author made use of the term \u2018psychophysical parallelism\u2019 in the title \u2013 the critics reproached \u2013, the work had nothing to do with scientific psychology. The following paper discusses the distinction between psychophysical parallelism as method and psychophysical parallelism as an explanation to the mind\u2013body problem. Only the former can be considered a proper scientific approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>rational psychology vs. scientific psychology; mind\u2013body problem; identity hypothesis; Titu Maiorescu; C. R\u0103dulescu-Motru.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

11.45\u201312.00 | Ion Dur<\/strong> | Centrul Universitar Nord, Baia Mare | Elogiul temperat al valorilor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

12.05\u201312.30| DISCU\u021aII<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

12.30\u201313.00 | PAUZ\u0102<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

13.00\u201313.15 | Ionu\u021b Isac<\/strong> | Institutul de Istorie \u201eGeorge Bari\u021biu\u201d, Academia Rom\u00e2n\u0103, Filiala Cluj-Napoca | Ion Petrovici despre rela\u021bia filosofie\u2013\u0219tiin\u021b\u0103: problema relativit\u0103\u021bii cunoa\u0219terii<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The Romanian thinker Ion Petrovici (1882\u20131972) was constantly concerned about the analysis and theoretisation of the philosophy\u2013science relationship (especially in the version of the relationship between metaphysics and natural sciences). In this respect, almost all his works, be they articles, studies, essays, author volumes, etc., cover this problematic area. Its approaches are of particular complexity and finesse, combining historical and epistemological analyses with ontological-metaphysical ones, without neglecting the fields of art, religion, morals, etc. We intend to examine some of these explorations by Petrovici, full of interesting personal contributions on the theoretical-methodological level (e.g. the issue of metaphysical legitimacy, the problem of the method in metaphysics, as well as the aspects of the relationship of metaphysics with science), which tend towards balanced, complex and fruitful solutions. We will also report these contributions to similar elaborations of some of his famous contemporaries (Lucian Blaga and Dumitru D. Rosca), to which they present, in some places, a continuity less surprised by commentators so far. In our opinion, Petrovici\u2019s argument, as a whole, is made for a holist-synthetic <\/em>conception of the great forms of spiritual culture (philosophy, science, art, religion, moral), which he strives to argue despite the differences in historical and systematic doctrinal conjuncture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/strong> Ion Petrovici; philosophy; science; knowledge; system; method.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

13.20\u201313.35 | Sorin-Avram V\u00eertop<\/strong> | Universitatea \u201eConstantin Br\u00e2ncu\u0219i\u201d, T\u00e2rgu-Jiu | Ion Petrovici: Prelegerile cu ocazia centenarelor lui J. F. Herbart (d. 1841) \u0219i Wilhelm Wundt (n. 1832) \u00een retrospectiv\u0103 \u0219i perspectiv\u0103<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Rezumat<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

Chiar dac\u0103 studiile despre filosofia kantian\u0103 \u0219i cele de logic\u0103 sunt cele mai cunoscute contribu\u021bii ale lui Ion Petrovici, perspectiva asupra g\u00e2ndirii filosofice \u0219i \u0219tiin\u021bifice trebuie extins\u0103 printr-o aborare holist\u0103 a contextului filosofic \u0219i \u0219tiin\u021bific \u00een care acesta s-a format \u0219i a creat. Cele dou\u0103 prelegeri sunt reprezentative din acest punct de vedere. Pentru J. F. Herbart, recunoa\u0219te importan\u021ba acestuia\u00a0\u00een domeniul educa\u021biei prin contribu\u021biile promotorilor pedagogiei herbartiene, precum \u0219i durata aplic\u0103rii acestora \u00een Rom\u00e2nia. \u00cen ceea ce \u00eel prive\u0219te pe W. Wundt, dincolo de experien\u021ba formativ\u0103 prin audierea cursurilor acestuia la Universitatea din Leipzig, subliniaz\u0103 sensurile potrivite pentru \u00een\u021belegerea activit\u0103\u021bii \u0219tiin\u021bifice \u0219i operei acestuia, \u00een special a lucr\u0103rii V\u00f6lkerpsychologie<\/em>. Extinz\u00e2nd limitele acestor sisteme\u00a0\u00een trecut, p\u00e2n\u0103 la Leibniz, \u0219i apoi\u00a0p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent, lu\u00e2nd \u00een considerare \u0219i contribu\u021biile studen\u021bilor americani care s-au preg\u0103tit cu Wundt, observ\u0103m c\u0103 multe concepte au fost reconfigurate, extinse \u0219i aplicate \u00een func\u021bie de noile dezvolt\u0103ri \u0219tiin\u021bifice, teoretice \u0219i tehnologice \u2013 \u0219i revin \u00een practic\u0103 \u0219i actualitate \u0219i acolo unde la un moment dat au ajuns s\u0103 fie considerate\u00a0 obsolete. Un caz este cel al apercep\u021biei, iar modele instruc\u021bionale precum \u00eenv\u0103\u021barea activ\u0103 \u0219i \u00eenv\u0103\u021barea fuzionat\u0103 (blended learning<\/em>) \u00ee\u0219i pierd originea \u00een \u00eencerc\u0103rile herbartiene. Un exeget al operei lui Wundt afirm\u0103 c\u0103 conceptul de cogni\u021bie este o \u00eencercare de \u00eenlocuire a apercep\u021biei, iar modelul sistemului de procesare centralizat\u0103 a informa\u021biei nu este at\u00e2t de vast precum construc\u021bia teoretic\u0103 a lui Wundt (conform lui Jochen Fahrenberg). Cert este c\u0103\u00a0 la aceste prelegeri contribu\u021biile \u0219i literatura filosofic\u0103 din Rom\u00e2nia \u2013 fie c\u0103 este vorba de istorii ale filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti \u0219i universale (moderne, contemporane), exegeze \u0219i interpret\u0103ri, traduceri \u2013 au f\u0103cut un progres deosebit, ceea ce permite extinderea c\u00e2mpului de \u00een\u021belegere \u0219i interpretare. Pe de alt\u0103 parte, digitalizarea prin facilitarea accesului la opere \u0219i materiale din domeniul public\u00a0ajut\u0103 la \u00een\u021belegerea adecvat\u0103 \u0219i contextual\u0103 \u00een vederea valorific\u0103rii acestor modele practice \u00eentr-un mod relevant pentru cultura \u0219i societatea noastr\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cuvinte-cheie:<\/strong> apercep\u021bie; \u00eenv\u0103\u021bare activ\u0103; \u00eenv\u0103\u021bare fuzionat\u0103; cogni\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

13.40\u201313.55 | Eugeniu Nistor<\/strong> | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne | Scrierile lui Ion Petrovici comentate \u00een istoriile consacrate filosofiei rom\u00e2ne\u015fti<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

An ardent supporter of traditionalist metaphysics and the reconciliation of philosophy with science and religion, in order to substantiate real philosophical knowledge, Ion Petrovici pleaded in his writings for the use of both the empirical-rationalist and the intuitionist method. Extremely favorable, N. Bagdasar’s commentary on “The History of Romanian Philosophy” (1940) objectively describes, the philosopher’s courageous attempts, carried out at the height of logical positivism, to legitimize metaphysics. But this attitude is not to be found anymore after the war, in the conditions of the new political rules imposed in the country during the “era” of communist totalitarianism, when his philosophical writings are marginalized or, when commented, they are framed in the “decadent” currents of spiritualist orientation. It was only after 1990, that some authors of syntheses, compendia, monographs and histories of Romanian philosophy (Gheorghe Vl\u0103du\u0163escu, Alexandru Surdu, Ion Iano\u015fi, Al. Boboc, Vasile Musc\u0103, Angela Botez, Viorel Vizureanu etc.), restore the proper interpretation of Ion Petrovici’s work, giving it due importance and placing the philosopher among Maiorescu\u00a0 disciples , with valuable philosophical contributions especially in logic (obtaining and the nature of notions, their sphere and content etc.), in metaphysics and in the theory of knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/strong> theory of notions; psycho-physical parallelism; critical realism; N. Bagdasar, History of Romanian philosophy<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

14.00\u201314.15 | Adrian Ciocioman<\/strong> | Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie | Raportul dintre metafizic\u0103 \u0219i religie la Ion Petrovici. \u00centre metafizic\u0103 de consolare \u0219i g\u00e2ndire categorial\u0103<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Rezumat<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In the following paper, Ion Petrovici\u2019s concept of metaphysics is taken into consideration. Starting from the debates on metaphysics that were at their peak at the beginning of the last century, the present paper explores the possibility of a metaphysical approach from the point of view of a categorial thinking while emphasizing on the relationship between metaphysics and religion. In Petrovici\u2019s view, metaphysics is an expression of a tendency of the soul, as well as of a need for absolute truth \u2013 expression that aims at a practicality intrinsic to the discourse. The metaphysics as science becomes therefore a metaphysics of consolation that seeks the meaning of Being and eternity at the expense of the factual truth. In the end, the relationship between scientific and metaphysical progress will be addressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cuvinte-cheie: <\/strong>metaphysics; tendency of the soul; progress; truth; categorial think\u00ading; metaphysics of consolation.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

14.20\u201314.35 | Mihai Popa<\/strong> | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne | Ion Petrovici: c\u00e2t de aproape suntem de adev\u0103r?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

In a conference held at Sorbonne on March 25, 1936, \u201cLa connaissance humaine et le transcendent\u201d (Human knowledge and the transcendent), Ion Petrovici discussed the following problem which he traced through the history of philosophy to the present day: Is thought capable of perceiving reality itself? He distinguished between the gnoseological and ontological aspects of the problem. The first one is related to the nature and capacity of human functions (sensation, perception, intellect, reason) to intuit and render reality in knowledge. The second one belongs to the very structure of reality, of the object of knowledge. Fundamental categories of Kant\u2019s philosophy, such as existence, causality, and substance are brought into discussion. Provocative, but often puzzling, is that, from whatever field we start, we quickly reach a result that has an almost apodictic meaning: thinking always aims beyond itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>reality; appearance; truth; essence; knowledge; metaphysics vs. science.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

14.40\u201314.55 | Ovidiu G. Grama<\/strong> | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne | I. Petrovici \u0219i E. Goblot despre sfera \u0219i con\u021binutul no\u021biunilor: o inadverten\u021b\u0103 istoriografic\u0103<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Abstract<\/p>\n\t\t\t

<\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\n\n

The paper tries to identify the imperfections of a small book review from 1920, which had a disproportionate impact on subsequent Romanian philosophical historiography. The review in question is signed by Petre Andrei; he points to a parallel between certain novel ideas of the logicians Ion Petrovici and Edmond Goblot, drawing attention to the complete similarity of their conceptions and the priority that the former would have over the latter regarding their thoughts on the relationship between the intension and the extension of logical concepts. But the ideas were not so novel, the similarity was not so complete, and the priority did not exist, or at least this is what I will try to establish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>law of inverse variation of extension and intension; connotation; comprehension; concept; idea; static and dynamic perspectives; historical priority; Petre Andrei; Ion Petrovici; Edmond Goblot.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

15.00\u201315.30 | DEZBATERI<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

10.00 | DESCHIDEREA LUCR\u0102RILOR 10.05\u201310.20 | Viorel Cernica | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne \/ Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie | Reprezent\u0103ri filosofice ale unit\u0103\u021bii existen\u021bei: prin credin\u021b\u0103 noetic\u0103 \u0219i credin\u021b\u0103 perceptiv\u0103 10. 25\u201310.40 | Constantin Stoenescu | Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie| \u201eSpiritul \u0219tiin\u021bific\u201d \u0219i \u201espiritul filosofic\u201d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[176],"tags":[130],"class_list":["post-5002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-colocvii","tag-ion-petrovici"],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/mm\/"},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"SIFR","author_link":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/author\/mm\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"10.00 | DESCHIDEREA LUCR\u0102RILOR 10.05\u201310.20 | Viorel Cernica | Institutul de Filosofie \u0219i Psihologie \u201eConstantin R\u0103dulescu-Motru\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne \/ Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie | Reprezent\u0103ri filosofice ale unit\u0103\u021bii existen\u021bei: prin credin\u021b\u0103 noetic\u0103 \u0219i credin\u021b\u0103 perceptiv\u0103 10. 25\u201310.40 | Constantin Stoenescu | Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, Facultatea de Filosofie| \u201eSpiritul \u0219tiin\u021bific\u201d \u0219i \u201espiritul filosofic\u201d…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5002"}],"version-history":[{"count":129,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8380,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5002\/revisions\/8380"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filosofieromaneasca.institutuldefilosofie.ro\/sifr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}